
Corgi Quantum Computing ETF
$23.90+0.09 (+0.38%)
- Expense ratio
- 0.35%
- Fund size
- $15M
- 1Y return
- —
- Yield · Last 12 months
- —
- Holdings
- 30
- Volume · 30D
- 0M sh
- NAV per share
- $23.84
- 52W range
The ETF.net CQTM Grade
Score 65 of 100 sits in the B band. Bands: A ≥ 70, B ≥ 55, C ≥ 40, D ≥ 25, F < 25; the scale skips E.
Cost
What you pay to own it — the expense ratio plus trading frictions, ranked within its category.AScore 88Category rankMission
How faithfully it does the job it claims — tracking its mandate or index with minimal slippage.Not scoredRisk
How violently it can move — volatility, drawdown depth, and downside capture versus its category.CScore 42Category rankTradability
How cheaply and easily you can get in and out — liquidity, spread, and premium/discount stability.CScore 53Category rankHoldings
What it actually owns — the quality, breadth, and concentration of the underlying portfolio.BScore 59Category rankDurability
Whether it will still be here — the fund’s assets, age, flows, and issuer staying power.BScore 55Category rank
Our read on CQTM
BAn active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.
The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.
Why people hold it
- 0.35% a year, comfortably below the median fee for the global thematic funds we grade.
- The 80% mandate stretches past hardware: quantum-enabled technologies and post-quantum security are in scope, so defense against quantum counts alongside the build-out.
- Actively managed and global in reach (US and international names), so the manager can rotate as the field moves instead of waiting on an index committee.
- Lands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group in our grading, with no structural red flags on the wrapper (a standard 1940 Act fund).
Worth knowing
- Launched in 2026, so the track record is short, and volatility has screened high even by single-theme standards. Our read on its risk rests on limited history.
- Small asset base and light trading volume, which tends to mean wider gaps between the buy and sell price than on household-name ETFs.
- The mandate targets capital appreciation and the fund has not been paying regular distributions, so this is a price-return holding.
CQTM Holdings
- Stocks
- 30
- 71%
- IONQ
Sectors
- Technology90.9%
- Communication5.0%
- Industrials4.1%
Geography
- United States74.08%
- Canada10.49%
- United Kingdom4.47%
- Singapore3.91%
- Finland3.19%
- Switzerland3.00%
- France0.87%
CQTM Performance
Shows how $10,000 changes over the selected period, with cash distributions reinvested at the closing price on each ex-dividend date.
Returns run to the Sep 22, 2026 close, with cash distributions reinvested. Each period starts on the same date that many months or years earlier. Periods over one year show the average yearly return.
| Period | CQTM |
|---|---|
| Year to date | — |
| 1 month | −9.2% |
| 3 months | −27.9% |
| 1 year | — |
| 3 years | — |
| 5 years | — |
| 10 years | — |
Calendar-year total return with cash distributions hypothetically reinvested at the ex-dividend date’s closing price. The current year shows year to date.
| Year | Return bar | CQTM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 YTD | −13.8% |
CQTM in the news
ETF.net Research hasn’t filed on CQTM yet — coverage lands here as it’s written.
CQTM Dividends
Listed May 2026. No distributions yet.
CQTM Risk
- —
How it’s calculated: standard deviation
The sample standard deviation of monthly total returns, multiplied by the square root of 12.
Uses up to 36 complete months, with at least 12 required. Total returns include reinvested distributions.
- —
How it’s calculated: Sharpe ratio
Subtract each month’s Treasury-bill return from the fund’s monthly total return.
Divide the average of those excess returns by their sample standard deviation, then multiply by the square root of 12.
Uses up to 36 complete months, with at least 12 required. Each month uses the Treasury yield quoted at the end of the previous month.
- —
How it’s calculated: maximum drawdown
The largest percentage decline from an earlier peak, using total returns with reinvested distributions.
Uses up to five years through the last close, with at least 12 months required.
- 4.26
How it’s calculated: beta
The beta figure is supplied by FMP. The comparison index depends on the fund’s broad asset class.
CQTM Cost
- The middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
No Quantum Computing & Photonics fund charges less.