Skip to content

Fund RadarETF Filings

Genter Capital summaries show 0.38% all-in, 0.18% outside the management fee

Spinnaker ETF Series filed Form 497K summary prospectuses on Friday, September 11, 2026, for GEND, GENW, GENT and GENM, listing 0.38% total expenses at three funds and 0.39% at the municipal fund.

· 2 min read · By ETF.net Research

A sailboat with a bright orange spinnaker sail catches the wind as it cuts through the water.

Key takeaways

  • Three Genter funds carry an all-in cost of 0.38% a year; the municipal fund is a shade higher.
  • Most of the cost sits outside the management fee, in other expenses.
  • The sub-advisor's cut comes out of the advisor's fee, not on top of it.
  • Both the municipal and dividend funds price above comparable peers.

Friday’s Genter Capital summaries, filed by Spinnaker ETF Series, are Rule 497(k) short forms of the September 1 prospectus. They are not a new registration, and they leave the fees unchanged. The summaries list an all-in cost of 0.38% a year at three of the funds and 0.39% at the municipal fund, against a 0.20% management fee.

The four fee tables put a 0.20% management fee next to 0.18% of other expenses. Only the municipal total differs.

FundManagement feeOther expensesTotal
U.S. dividend-stock fund GEND0.20%0.18%0.38%
Foreign dividend-stock fund GENW0.20%0.18%0.38%
Intermediate taxable-bond fund GENT0.20%0.18%0.38%
Intermediate municipal-bond fund GENM0.20%0.18%0.39%

GENM is the only summary that also lists acquired fund fees, 0.01%, the indirect cost of holding other funds.

OBP is the advisor. Genter is paid from that fee

All four name OBP Capital, LLC as investment advisor. RNC Capital Management LLC, doing business as Genter Capital Management, is the sub-advisor, and the manager whose name is on the funds. The September 1 prospectus states that OBP pays Genter a sub-advisory fee of 0.15% of average daily net assets out of the advisory fee.

That 0.18% of other expenses sits outside the advisory contract.

Intermediate municipal and dividend peers cost less

An index fund of intermediate AMT-free municipal bonds ITM has an expense ratio of 0.18%. An actively managed intermediate municipal-bond fund MUNI has an expense ratio of 0.35%. GENM at 0.39% sits above both.

An active U.S. dividend-stock fund CGDV has an expense ratio of 0.33%. GEND is at 0.38%.

The 0.15% Genter collects comes out of OBP’s 0.20%, not on top of it. The 0.18% of other expenses does not. That is the split Friday’s short form puts on one page.

ETFs in this story

CGENDGenter Capital Dividend Income ETF40/100CGENWGenter Capital International Dividend ETF40/100CGENTGenter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF41/100CGENMGenter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF42/100

Frequently asked questions

Do these filings change the fees?

No: they are Rule 497(k) short forms of the September 1 prospectus, not a new registration, and the fees are unchanged.

Who actually runs the funds?

OBP Capital is the investment advisor and Genter Capital Management is the sub-advisor, the manager whose name is on the funds.

Does Genter's fee add to the cost?

No: OBP pays Genter a 0.15% sub-advisory fee out of its own advisory fee.

How do the funds compare with peers?

The municipal fund costs more than both an index and an active intermediate municipal peer, and the U.S. dividend fund costs more than an active dividend peer.

Related articles