KWIN ranks 1st and AAPY 4th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
AAPY vs KWIN
KWIN −0.48pt a year
0.99%0.51%
KWIN 2.4×the volume
5.85K14K
AAPY vs KWIN Performance
+25.8%+2.9%
- AAPY 0.99%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- AAPY $8M
- KWIN $63M
- AAPY +28.3%
- KWIN
- AAPY 10.78%
- KWIN
- AAPY 6
- KWIN 55
- AAPY 5.85K sh
- KWIN 14K sh, better
- AAPY $28.39
- KWIN $25.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPY | KWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A77 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | A88Higher |
| Durability | B56 | B68Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. AAPY and KWIN are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPYA
KWINA
In short
AAPY Apple income without slamming the brakes on upside: AAPY builds its Apple exposure with options, sells calls above the market rather than at it, and pays monthly. Fee is 0.99% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.15% gross).
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
Stated mandate
AAPY The Fund seeks current income while providing exposure to Apple Inc.'s share price, with potential gains limited by its options strategy.
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPY vs KWIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPY vs KWIN Cost
Overpaying AAPY vs KWIN
$8,360
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPY 0.99%
$18,525
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPY | KWIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $918 | $828 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $3,527 | $3,038 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $10,165 | $8,360 |
- 0.99%AAPY
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
AAPY 9th cheapest of 71 funds
AAPY vs KWIN Dividends
- AAPY 10.78%
- KWIN
- AAPY $3.05
- KWIN None
- AAPY $0.25
- KWIN
- AAPY Oct 21, 2026
- KWIN
- AAPY Oct 22, 2026
- KWIN
- AAPY Monthly
- KWIN
Distribution history
AAPY vs KWIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPY 18.4%KWIN
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPY 0.84KWIN
- Worst fall
- AAPY −29.2%KWIN
- Market sensitivity
- AAPY 0.75KWIN 0.001
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.