JQUA ranks 1st and ABFL 19th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.
ABFL vs JQUA
JQUA −0.37pt a year
0.49%0.12%
JQUA 23.5×the volume
25.4K598K
JQUA +3.7pt
+9.5%+13.2%
ABFL vs JQUA Performance
+57.2%+85.7%
- ABFL 0.49%
- JQUA 0.12%, better
- ABFL $466M
- JQUA $9.55B
- ABFL +10.5%
- JQUA +21.8%, better
- ABFL 0.60%
- JQUA 1.05%, better
- ABFL 56
- JQUA 310
- ABFL 25.4K sh
- JQUA 598K sh, better
- ABFL $80.68
- JQUA $75.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ABFL | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B63 | A79Higher |
| Risk | D38 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | C54 | A83Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Quality Index funds
Same Category. ABFL and JQUA are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ABFLC
JQUAA
In short
ABFL One of the original free-cash-flow ETFs, trading since 2016 under three different names and one unchanged idea: rank US large and mid caps by cash generated per dollar of invested capital, then own the leaders.
JQUA Quality investing without the quality price tag. JQUA screens U.S. companies for profitability and strong balance-sheet traits, and charges 0.12%, the lowest fee in the quality-factor group we track.
Stated mandate
ABFL The SEC identifies ABFL as the renamed FCF US Quality ETF and states that the December 2024 name and ticker changes did not alter the Fund’s investment objective or principal investment strategies.
JQUA JQUA is designed to provide domestic equity exposure focused on companies with strong quality and profitability characteristics, using a rules-based approach intended to enhance returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ABFL vs JQUA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ABFL vs JQUA Cost
Overpaying ABFL vs JQUA
$7,272
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ABFL 0.49%
$9,792
JQUA 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ABFL | JQUA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $220 | $663 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $859 | $2,535 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $2,520 | $7,272 |
- 0.49%ABFL
- 0.12%JQUA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Quality Index funds
- Median 0.39%
JQUA cheapest of 26 funds
ABFL 17th cheapest of 26 funds
ABFL vs JQUA Dividends
- ABFL 0.60%
- JQUA 1.05%, better
- ABFL $0.48
- JQUA $0.79
- ABFL $0.11
- JQUA $0.18
- ABFL Sep 29, 2026
- JQUA Sep 22, 2026
- ABFL Sep 30, 2026
- JQUA Sep 24, 2026
- ABFL Quarterly
- JQUA Quarterly
Distribution history
ABFL vs JQUA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ABFL
- JQUA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ABFL 13.1%JQUA 11.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ABFL 0.96JQUA 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- ABFL −21.9%, betterJQUA −22.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ABFL 0.89JQUA 0.91
ABFL and JQUA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

