ILCV ranks 2nd and ABLD 94th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ABLD vs ILCV
ILCV −0.35pt a year
0.39%0.04%
ABLD 1.8×the volume
43.3K24.4K
ILCV +11.3pt
+11.3%+22.6%
ABLD vs ILCV Performance
+12.3%+21.0%
- ABLD 0.39%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- ABLD $12M
- ILCV $1.37B
- ABLD +12.3%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- ABLD 2.51%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- ABLD 54
- ILCV 375
- ABLD 43.3K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- ABLD $31.65
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ABLD | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | D25 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | D39Higher |
| Durability | F8 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ABLD and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ABLDD
ILCVA
In short
ABLD Free cash flow screening pointed at hard assets: US real asset companies filtered for the cash they actually generate. A niche twist in a peer group stuffed with broad, cheap value funds.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
ABLD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders Index.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ABLD vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ABLD vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying ABLD vs ILCV
$7,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ABLD 0.39%
$7,898
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ABLD | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $73 | $632 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $288 | $2,437 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $849 | $7,049 |
- 0.39%ABLD
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
ABLD 64th cheapest of 99 funds
ABLD vs ILCV Dividends
- ABLD 2.51%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- ABLD $0.78
- ILCV $1.65
- ABLD $0.21
- ILCV $0.42
- ABLD Sep 29, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- ABLD Sep 30, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- ABLD Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
ABLD vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ABLD 13.6%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ABLD 0.53ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- ABLD −19.3%ILCV −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ABLD 0.82ILCV 0.82Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.