Skip to content

ACEP vs HIDV

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

ACEPCNasdaq

AB US High Dividend ETF

HIDVANYSE Arca

Overlap

10.6%by weight

Expense ratio

HIDV −0.11pt a year

ACEP0.46%HIDV0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

HIDV 1.8×the volume

ACEP3.92KHIDV7.06K

ACEP vs HIDV Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.3%ACEP+13.2%HIDV

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ACEP +23.3%. HIDV +13.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ACEP 0.46%
HIDV 0.35%, better
Fund size
ACEP $102M
HIDV $207M
1Y total return
ACEP No data
HIDV +15.7%
Yield (12M)
ACEP No data
HIDV 2.54%
Holdings
ACEP 37
HIDV 109
Avg volume (30D)
ACEP 3.92K sh
HIDV 7.06K sh, better
NAV per share
ACEP $20.10
HIDV $89.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACEP: Cost 73, Risk 50, Mission 60, Tradability 25, Holdings 41, Durability 43. HIDV: Cost 91, Risk 31, Mission 80, Tradability 82, Holdings 69, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACEP, HIDV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACEPHIDV
Cost30% weightA73A91Higher
Mission25% weightB60A80Higher
Risk15% weightC50HigherD31
Tradability15% weightD25A82Higher
Holdings10% weightC41B69Higher
Durability5% weightC43A79Higher

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACEP and HIDV are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

HIDV ranks 2nd and ACEP 18th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ABGIGBahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 17CRFDAALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 18CACEPARS Core Equity Portfolio ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 19CDIVPCullen Enhanced Equity Income ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACEPCARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

HIDVAAB US High Dividend ETF

In short

ACEP A veteran New York boutique's long-running core equity strategy, wrapped in an ETF in late 2025: a human hunt for strong balance sheets, reasonable earnings growth and above-average dividend yields instead of an index screen.

HIDV HIDV hunts dividends without wandering off the map: an active, systematic screen on value, quality and momentum, wrapped around S&P 500-like market participation. Income tilt, core-equity shape.

Stated mandate

ACEP The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while also generating current income.

HIDV HIDV is an active U.S. equity ETF seeking core U.S. equity exposure, attractive dividend income, and capital appreciation. Its systematic process is designed to identify dividend opportunities while maintaining diversified, market-like participation.

Why people hold it

  • ACEP Real stock picking, not a screen: the sub-adviser targets US companies it deems high quality, judged on strong balance sheets, reasonable earnings growth and above-average dividend yields.etfarchitect.comsec.gov
  • Not a blank slate. The prospectus prints the sub-adviser's separate-account composite for this same core equity strategy, which dates back to October 2011.etfarchitect.com
  • 0.46% all in, gross and net identical with no waiver propping it up, and near the typical fee for active dividend-income ETFs. Cheaper peers exist: CGDV at 0.33%, VUS at 0.25%; BGIG sits at 0.45%.
  • Among the roughly 40 active dividend-and-income equity ETFs we cover, this one already sits in the upper half of the pack.
  • HIDV Charges 0.35%, well under the 0.55% median for active US dividend funds, and undercuts active peers like TDVG (0.50%) and BGIG (0.45%).
  • Stock picking is systematic, not vibes: AB advertises value, quality and momentum as the levers. You can see what drives the portfolio.alliancebernstein.com
  • Roughly 110 US names measured against the S&P 500, so the income tilt sits inside diversified core exposure rather than a narrow yield corner. Pays quarterly.
  • Stacks up as one of the stronger builds among the three dozen-odd active dividend-income ETFs we track.

Worth knowing

  • ACEP It listed in November 2025, so the live ETF record is short and risk readings rest on limited history.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than on a household-name fund and bigger orders need more care at the screen.
  • Current income is in the objective, but cash reaches shareholders on an annual or semiannual schedule, not monthly.
  • HIDV A smaller, thinly traded fund. Spreads can be wider than the category giants, so limit orders matter more here.
  • Launched in 2023, so the live record is short relative to older dividend franchises.
  • Fully invested US stock fund with no downside cushion. A dividend tilt is not a shock absorber when the market drops.

Full ACEP profile⁠

Full HIDV profile⁠

ACEP vs HIDV Holdings

How ACEP and HIDV differ

Overlap by weight

10.6%

Shared holdings make up 34.7% of ACEP and 15.4% of HIDV.

Level by level

  • Holdings11 in both10.6%
  • Countryby domicile89.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for HIDV.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ACEP and HIDV, widest gap first
CountryMore in ACEPMore in HIDV
United StatesHIDV +9.5 points
CanadaACEP +8.3 points
DenmarkACEP +2.2 points
IrelandHIDV +0.8 points
United KingdomHIDV +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ACEP38.4%
  • HIDV34.0%

Securities held

  • ACEP36
  • HIDV107

Asset class

ACEP
Equity
HIDV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ACEP25
  • In both11
  • Only in HIDV96

Only in ACEP

25 securities, 65.2% of ACEP by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 01/28/20275.26%
  • Accenture PLC3.95%
  • Targa Resources Corp3.94%

Only in HIDV

96 securities, 84.5% of HIDV by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0018.07%
  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006255.51%
  • Amazon.com Inc Common Stock USD.012.77%

Weight gaps

All 11 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ACEP and HIDV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ACEPMore in HIDV
Apple IncAAPLHIDV +4.78 points
Chevron CorpCVXACEP +4.27 points
JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMACEP +3.07 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJACEP +2.71 points
Southern Copper CorpSCCOACEP +2.53 points
RTX CorpRTXACEP +2.24 points
International Business Machines CorpIBMACEP +2.21 points
Broadcom IncAVGOACEP +2.07 points

All ACEP holdings⁠All 108 HIDV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACEP vs HIDV Cost

Overpaying ACEP vs HIDV

$2,104

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACEP 0.46%

    $9,230

  • HIDV 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACEP 0.46%
  • HIDV 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530ACEP $9,230HIDV $7,126

Year by year

YearACEPHIDVOverpaying
10$830$634$196
20$3,195$2,454$741
30$9,230$7,126$2,104

Expense ratio

  • 0.46%ACEP
  • 0.35%HIDV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
  • Median 0.50%

HIDV 4th cheapest of 40 funds

ACEP 14th cheapest of 40 funds

ACEP vs HIDV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACEP No data
HIDV 2.54%
Payout (12M)
ACEP No data
HIDV $2.28
Last payment
ACEP $0.02
HIDV $0.67
Ex-dividend
ACEP Dec 30, 2025
HIDV Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ACEP Dec 31, 2025
HIDV Sep 21, 2026
Frequency
ACEP Irregular
HIDV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ACEPIrregular · 1 paymentAll ACEP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
HIDVQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll HIDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 6, 2023 $0.30; Sep 5, 2023 $0.40; Dec 5, 2023 $0.60; Mar 5, 2024 $0.25; Jun 4, 2024 $0.34; Sep 3, 2024 $0.44; Dec 17, 2024 $0.63; Mar 5, 2025 $0.24; Jun 20, 2025 $0.50; Sep 19, 2025 $0.45; Dec 19, 2025 $0.60; Mar 20, 2026 $0.46; Jun 22, 2026 $0.54; Sep 18, 2026 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ACEP vs HIDV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACEP No dataHIDV 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACEP No dataHIDV 1.43
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACEP No dataHIDV −18.8%since Mar 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACEP 0.85HIDV 0.98

Popular comparisons

  • ACEPCvsCGDVA

    ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HIDVAvsCGDVA

    AB US High Dividend ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACEPCvsBGIGA

    ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HIDVAvsBGIGA

    AB US High Dividend ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACEPCvsBGDVB

    ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HIDVAvsBGDVB

    AB US High Dividend ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.