DFAC ranks 3rd and ACLC 39th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
ACLC vs DFAC
DFAC −0.22pt a year
0.39%0.17%
DFAC 252.1×the volume
7.95K2M
DFAC +2.6pt
+8.5%+11.1%
ACLC vs DFAC Performance
+50.4%+69.4%
- ACLC 0.39%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- ACLC $321M
- DFAC $87.7B
- ACLC +8.0%
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- ACLC 0.57%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- ACLC 100
- DFAC 2553
- ACLC 7.95K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- ACLC $84.52
- DFAC $44.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACLC | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. ACLC and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACLCB
DFACA
In short
ACLC An active large-cap fund that blends growth and value names and folds material sustainability factors into the stock picking, at a fee well below what the typical active US equity fund charges.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
ACLC The fund seeks long-term financial returns through an actively managed U.S. large-cap portfolio combining growth and value companies while incorporating material sustainability factors into the investment process.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACLC vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACLC vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying ACLC vs DFAC
$4,352
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACLC 0.39%
$7,898
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACLC | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $310 | $395 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $1,211 | $1,514 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $3,546 | $4,352 |
- 0.39%ACLC
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
ACLC 29th cheapest of 121 funds
ACLC vs DFAC Dividends
- ACLC 0.57%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- ACLC $0.48
- DFAC $0.39
- ACLC $0.10
- DFAC $0.10
- ACLC Sep 8, 2026
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- ACLC Sep 10, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- ACLC Quarterly
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
ACLC vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ACLC
- DFAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACLC 13.0%DFAC 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ACLC 1.02DFAC 1.32, better
- Worst fall
- ACLC −26.4%DFAC −23.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ACLC 1.03DFAC 0.99
ACLC and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.