OKTG ranks 3rd and ACLZ 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ACLZ vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
ACLZ −0.30pt a year
0.45%0.75%
OKTG 45.3×the volume
85038.5K
ACLZ vs OKTG Performance
−48.8%+79.7%
- ACLZ 0.45%, better
- OKTG 0.75%
- ACLZ $0
- OKTG $8M
- ACLZ 1
- OKTG 5
- ACLZ 850 sh
- OKTG 38.5K sh, better
- ACLZ $6.52
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACLZ | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D38 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | F8 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F19 | C51Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ACLZ and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACLZC
OKTGA
In short
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACLZ vs OKTG Holdings
How ACLZ and OKTG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ACLZ and 0.0% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ACLZ and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ACLZMore in OKTG | ACLZ | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- ACLZ197.5%
- OKTG200.3%
- ACLZ0
- OKTG1
Asset class
- ACLZ
- Equity
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ACLZ0
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in ACLZ
0 securities, 0.0% of ACLZ by weight
Only in OKTG
1 security, 0.3% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20400.32%
Weight gaps
ACLZ and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACLZ vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying OKTG vs ACLZ
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACLZ 0.45%
$9,041
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACLZ | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,336 | $524 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,078 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,482 | $5,441 |
- 0.45%ACLZ, cheaper
- 0.75%OKTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
ACLZ 7th cheapest of 315 funds
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
ACLZ vs OKTG Dividends
- ACLZ None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
ACLZ vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- ACLZ −5.42OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.