ACWV ranks 2nd and TLTD 6th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
ACWV vs TLTD
ACWV −0.19pt a year
0.20%0.39%
ACWV 15.8×the volume
93.5K5.93K
TLTD +1.4pt
+8.2%+9.6%
ACWV vs TLTD Performance
+36.2%+60.9%
- ACWV 0.20%, better
- TLTD 0.39%
- ACWV $3.44B
- TLTD $661M
- ACWV +11.7%
- TLTD +16.2%, better
- ACWV 1.83%
- TLTD 3.32%, better
- ACWV 406
- TLTD 2276
- ACWV 93.5K sh, better
- TLTD 5.93K sh
- ACWV $129.38
- TLTD $100.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWV | TLTD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | C43 |
| Mission | D25 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A77Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | A76 | A88Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | B56 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. ACWV and TLTD are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWVB
TLTDB
In short
ACWV Global min vol in one ticker: an optimizer sifts the MSCI ACWI universe, developed and emerging, for the lowest-risk mix of roughly 400 stocks. Same playbook since 2011, at 0.20% a year.
TLTD Most international factor funds cut the market down to a few hundred names. TLTD keeps roughly 2,300 developed ex-US stocks and leans the weights toward small caps and value instead. A whole-market tilt, not a screen.
Stated mandate
ACWV The fund seeks to track an index of developed and emerging market equities that collectively exhibit lower volatility than the broader developed and emerging equity markets.
TLTD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through broad developed-markets equity exposure outside the United States, with an intentional tilt toward small-capitalization and value stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWV vs TLTD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWV vs TLTD Cost
Overpaying TLTD vs ACWV
$3,743
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWV 0.20%
$4,155
TLTD 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWV | TLTD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $705 | $340 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $2,725 | $1,304 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $7,898 | $3,743 |
- 0.20%ACWV, cheaper
- 0.39%TLTD
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
ACWV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
TLTD 9th cheapest of 15 funds
ACWV vs TLTD Dividends
- ACWV 1.83%
- TLTD 3.32%, better
- ACWV $2.36
- TLTD $3.32
- ACWV $1.07
- TLTD $0.42
- ACWV Jun 15, 2026
- TLTD Sep 18, 2026
- ACWV Jun 18, 2026
- TLTD Sep 24, 2026
- ACWV Twice a year
- TLTD Quarterly
Distribution history
ACWV vs TLTD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ACWV
- TLTD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWV 8.7%, betterTLTD 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWV 1.03TLTD 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- ACWV −18.1%, betterTLTD −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ACWV 0.53TLTD 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.