Skip to content

ACYQ vs AMDY

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF

AMDYBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.25pt a year

ACYQ0.75%AMDY1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

AMDY 3.7×the volume

ACYQ98KAMDY359K

ACYQ vs AMDY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ+17.3%AMDY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. AMDY +17.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%30%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
AMDY 1.00%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
AMDY $442M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
AMDY +70.3%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
AMDY 78.81%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
AMDY 14
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh
AMDY 359K sh, better
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
AMDY $40.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. AMDY: Cost 77, Risk 51, Mission 42, Tradability 70, Holdings not scored, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, AMDY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQAMDY
Cost30% weightA99HigherA77
Mission25% weightNot scoredC42
Risk15% weightA96HigherC51
Tradability15% weightB55A70Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66A87Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and AMDY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and AMDY 13th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 8BWMTIREX WMT Growth & Income ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 13BAMDYYieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 13BAMZYYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

AMDYBYieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

AMDY An income wrapper bolted onto one chip stock. AMDY sells call spreads on AMD to harvest premium while keeping a slice of the stock's upside, and it charges less than the typical single-stock income fund.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

AMDY The fund seeks to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on AMD while retaining some participation in AMD's share-price appreciation.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • AMDY Sells call spreads rather than plain covered calls, so the fund keeps room to participate in part of AMD's share-price appreciation instead of surrendering all of it for premium.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • Fee runs 1.00%, under the median for single-stock option-income peers and below the other AMD income ETF in the set (AMYY).
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of single-stock option overlays, with a live track record dating to its 2023 launch.
  • Built to push out current income from option premium on a recurring schedule, inside a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • AMDY AMD exposure here is synthetic, built with options instead of shares, so there is no ownership of the stock and results can diverge from AMD's own path.
  • Everything rides on one semiconductor name, and the call spreads limit how much of a sharp AMD rally the fund can capture.
  • No declared target yield: payouts come from option premium, which moves with AMD's volatility rather than a fixed rate.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full AMDY profile⁠

ACYQ vs AMDY Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs AMDY Cost

Overpaying AMDY vs ACYQ

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • AMDY 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • AMDY 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530AMDY $18,688ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQAMDYOverpaying
10$1,336$1,763$427
20$5,078$6,625$1,547
30$14,482$18,688$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.00%AMDY
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

AMDY 20th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs AMDY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
AMDY 78.81%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
AMDY $32.13
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
AMDY $0.36
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
AMDY Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
AMDY Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
AMDY Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD
AMDYWeekly · 44 paymentsAll AMDY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.38; Jan 8, 2026 $0.40; Jan 15, 2026 $0.32; Jan 22, 2026 $0.35; Jan 29, 2026 $0.55; Feb 5, 2026 $0.35; Feb 12, 2026 $0.35; Feb 19, 2026 $0.28; Feb 26, 2026 $0.30; Mar 5, 2026 $0.33; Mar 12, 2026 $0.31; Mar 19, 2026 $0.32; Mar 26, 2026 $0.33; Apr 2, 2026 $0.33; Apr 9, 2026 $0.50; Apr 16, 2026 $0.70; Apr 23, 2026 $0.87; Apr 30, 2026 $0.94; May 7, 2026 $0.91; May 14, 2026 $1.09; May 21, 2026 $0.97; May 28, 2026 $1.16; Jun 4, 2026 $1.17; Jun 11, 2026 $0.67; Jun 18, 2026 $1.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.88; Jul 2, 2026 $0.80; Jul 9, 2026 $0.88; Jul 16, 2026 $0.85; Jul 23, 2026 $0.72; Jul 30, 2026 $0.63; Aug 6, 2026 $0.68; Aug 13, 2026 $0.56; Aug 20, 2026 $0.61; Aug 27, 2026 $0.48; Sep 3, 2026 $0.49; Sep 10, 2026 $0.38; Sep 17, 2026 $0.39; Sep 24, 2026 $0.78; Oct 1, 2026 $0.99; Oct 8, 2026 $1.03; Oct 15, 2026 $0.67; Oct 22, 2026 $0.34; Oct 29, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

ACYQ vs AMDY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataAMDY 58.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataAMDY 0.87
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataAMDY −53.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82AMDY 2.19

ACYQ and AMDY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMDYBvsKWINA

    YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMDYBvsXXVA

    YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMDYBvsAAPYA

    YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.