Skip to content
etf.net

ACYQ vs HOYY

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF

HOYYDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.43pt a year

ACYQ0.75%HOYY1.18%

Avg volume · 30D

ACYQ 2.6×the volume

ACYQ98KHOYY38.2K

ACYQ vs HOYY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ−1.7%HOYY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. HOYY −1.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%8%10%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
HOYY 1.18%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
HOYY $8M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
HOYY −51.3%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
HOYY 257.13%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
HOYY 6
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh, better
HOYY 38.2K sh
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
HOYY $4.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. HOYY: Cost 19, Risk 22, Mission 47, Tradability 34, Holdings not scored, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, HOYY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQHOYY
Cost30% weightA99HigherF19
Mission25% weightNot scoredC47
Risk15% weightA96HigherF22
Tradability15% weightB55HigherD34
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66HigherB55

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and HOYY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and HOYY 63rd of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 63DFBYYGraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETFScore 31
  5. Rank 63DHOYYGraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETFScore 31
  6. Rank 65DATCGraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETFScore 28

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

HOYYDGraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

HOYY Most single-stock income funds write options on the stock. HOYY goes one layer out and sells options on a 2x leveraged Robinhood ETF, harvesting premium off amplified swings, with gains capped and the leveraged downside left open.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

HOYY The Fund seeks current income by selling options on leveraged ETFs linked to Robinhood Markets, Inc.’s common stock. Its secondary objective is exposure to the related 2x leveraged ETF, subject to a cap on potential gains.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • HOYY The mechanism is the story: income comes from selling options on a 2x leveraged HOOD ETF, where bigger daily swings mean fatter option premiums than writing on the shares.graniteshares.com
  • At 1.07%, the fee sits right at the middle of the single-stock option-income crowd, not the expensive end.
  • It is a registered 1940 Act fund, so the leveraged options trade runs inside the wrapper instead of in your own account.graniteshares.com

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • HOYY Upside is capped by design; the leveraged downside is not. A hard drop in Robinhood stock can outrun what the option premium brings in.
  • Payouts can include return of capital, meaning part of a distribution is your own money coming back rather than earnings.graniteshares.com
  • Small, lightly traded and launched in 2025, so spreads can be wide. HOOY writes on HOOD directly, costs less, and stands higher in this peer group.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full HOYY profile⁠

ACYQ vs HOYY Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs HOYY Cost

Overpaying HOYY vs ACYQ

$7,061

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • HOYY 1.18%

    $21,543

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • HOYY 1.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530HOYY $21,543ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQHOYYOverpaying
10$1,336$2,065$729
20$5,078$7,697$2,619
30$14,482$21,543$7,061

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.18%HOYY
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

HOYY 48th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs HOYY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
HOYY 257.13%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
HOYY $10.26
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
HOYY $0.06
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
HOYY Oct 30, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
HOYY Pays Nov 3, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
HOYY Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
HOYYWeekly · 44 paymentsAll HOYY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.37; Jan 9, 2026 $0.37; Jan 16, 2026 $0.36; Jan 23, 2026 $0.32; Jan 30, 2026 $0.30; Feb 6, 2026 $0.27; Feb 13, 2026 $0.24; Feb 20, 2026 $0.22; Feb 27, 2026 $0.22; Mar 6, 2026 $0.16; Mar 13, 2026 $0.16; Mar 20, 2026 $0.15; Mar 27, 2026 $0.14; Apr 2, 2026 $0.13; Apr 10, 2026 $0.13; Apr 17, 2026 $0.13; Apr 24, 2026 $0.13; May 1, 2026 $0.12; May 8, 2026 $0.12; May 15, 2026 $0.09; May 22, 2026 $0.08; May 29, 2026 $0.08; Jun 5, 2026 $0.09; Jun 12, 2026 $0.08; Jun 18, 2026 $0.09; Jun 26, 2026 $0.08; Jul 2, 2026 $0.08; Jul 10, 2026 $0.08; Jul 17, 2026 $0.08; Jul 24, 2026 $0.08; Jul 31, 2026 $0.07; Aug 7, 2026 $0.07; Aug 14, 2026 $0.08; Aug 21, 2026 $0.07; Aug 28, 2026 $0.07; Sep 4, 2026 $0.07; Sep 11, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 25, 2026 $0.07; Oct 2, 2026 $0.07; Oct 9, 2026 $0.06; Oct 16, 2026 $0.06; Oct 23, 2026 $0.06; Oct 30, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ACYQ vs HOYY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataHOYY 24.3%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataHOYY −2.67since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataHOYY −53.5%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82HOYY 0.94

ACYQ and HOYY in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HOYYDvsKWINA

    GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HOYYDvsXXVA

    GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HOYYDvsAAPYA

    GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.