Skip to content

ACYQ vs PLA

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF

PLACNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.43pt a year

ACYQ0.75%PLA1.18%

Avg volume · 30D

ACYQ 21.8×the volume

ACYQ98KPLA4.5K

ACYQ vs PLA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ+12.2%PLA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. PLA +12.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
PLA 1.18%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
PLA $6M
Holdings
ACYQ 7
PLA 6
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh, better
PLA 4.5K sh
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
PLA $25.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. PLA: Cost 19, Risk 92, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings not scored, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, PLA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQPLA
Cost30% weightA99HigherF19
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA96HigherA92
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC42
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66HigherC47

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and PLA are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and PLA 40th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 40CAHDGraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 40CPLAGraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETFScore 43
  6. Rank 40CSMYYGraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

PLACGraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

PLA Structured-note plumbing in ETF packaging. PLA holds a laddered book of autocallables on Palantir, paying coupons only while the stock stays above set barriers, with losses tracking PLTR below them.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

PLA The Fund seeks income and limited downside protection through exposure to autocallables referencing Palantir Technologies Inc., with a laddered structure intended to support recurring income and reduce timing risk.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • PLA Not another covered-call fund. Income comes from autocallable contracts whose coupons pay when PLTR sits above the coupon barrier on an observation date.graniteshares.comgraniteshares.com 2
  • Laddered and rolling: several autocallables with staggered terms, so one start date or one bad observation window does not define the whole fund.graniteshares.com
  • Autocallable exposure without the bank note. It is a registered 1940 Act ETF you can trade any day, not a hold-to-maturity structured product.graniteshares.com
  • Fee of 1.07% a year sits right at the median for single-stock options-income funds, though peers like BRKC and TSMY come in near 1.00%.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • PLA Coupons are contingent, not fixed. Below the coupon barrier they can shrink or skip entirely, and payouts may include return of capital.graniteshares.com
  • A barrier, not a buffer. If PLTR ends below the maturity barrier, that position can lose like the stock itself; hitting the autocall barrier ends its coupons early.graniteshares.comgraniteshares.com 2
  • Launched in 2026 and small since day one, with light trading. Spreads can run wider than the category's household names.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full PLA profile⁠

ACYQ vs PLA Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs PLA Cost

Overpaying PLA vs ACYQ

$7,061

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • PLA 1.18%

    $21,543

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • PLA 1.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530PLA $21,543ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQPLAOverpaying
10$1,336$2,065$729
20$5,078$7,697$2,619
30$14,482$21,543$7,061

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.18%PLA
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

PLA 48th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs PLA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
PLA $0.42
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
PLA Oct 7, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
PLA Oct 9, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
PLA Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
PLAMonthly · 5 paymentsAll PLA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments in 2026 YTD. Jun 3, 2026 $0.42; Jul 1, 2026 $0.45; Aug 12, 2026 $0.43; Sep 9, 2026 $0.42; Oct 7, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

ACYQ vs PLA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82PLA 0.46

ACYQ and PLA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLACvsKWINA

    GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLACvsXXVA

    GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLACvsAAPYA

    GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.