TCAL ranks 1st and ADME 11th of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.
ADME vs TCAL
TCAL −0.45pt a year
0.79%0.34%
TCAL 6.7×the volume
11.8K79.2K
ADME vs TCAL Performance
+9.2%+10.8%
- ADME 0.79%
- TCAL 0.34%, better
- ADME $299M
- TCAL $321M
- ADME +9.2%
- TCAL +10.8%, better
- ADME 0.37%
- TCAL 11.55%, better
- ADME 171
- TCAL 106
- ADME 11.8K sh
- TCAL 79.2K sh, better
- ADME $54.49
- TCAL $23.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ADME | TCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A74 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A91Higher | A84 |
Rank among Active Option Income funds
Same Category. ADME and TCAL are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ADMEB
TCALA
In short
ADME Most option-overlay funds sell upside to manufacture income. ADME runs the other playbook: a US stock portfolio paired with exchange-listed puts, aiming for growth with the drawdowns clipped. It has been doing it since 2016.
TCAL An active stock picker's take on the covered-call trade: roughly 70 hand-chosen holdings, calls written on top, cash paid out monthly, all for 0.34% a year.
Stated mandate
ADME The Fund seeks capital appreciation while limiting downside risk. It is actively managed and uses equity investments together with exchange-listed put options or related option strategies.
TCAL The fund seeks regular distributions while aiming to preserve capital and potentially achieve capital appreciation. It invests in equities and writes covered calls to generate cash flow alongside dividends.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ADME vs TCAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ADME vs TCAL Cost
Overpaying ADME vs TCAL
$8,242
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ADME 0.79%
$15,174
TCAL 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ADME | TCAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $616 | $789 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $2,386 | $2,945 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $6,932 | $8,242 |
- 0.79%ADME
- 0.34%TCAL, cheaper
- Middle half of Active Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
TCAL 2nd cheapest of 50 funds
ADME 17th cheapest of 50 funds
ADME vs TCAL Dividends
- ADME 0.37%
- TCAL 11.55%, better
- ADME $0.20
- TCAL $2.71
- ADME $0.04
- TCAL $0.26
- ADME Sep 29, 2026
- TCAL Oct 30, 2026
- ADME Sep 30, 2026
- TCAL Nov 3, 2026
- ADME Quarterly
- TCAL Monthly
Distribution history
ADME vs TCAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ADME 11.2%TCAL 9.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ADME 1.14TCAL 0.24
- Worst fall
- ADME −23.4%TCAL −7.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ADME 0.88TCAL 0.20
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.