DFAC ranks 3rd and AESR 98th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
AESR vs DFAC
DFAC −0.80pt a year
0.97%0.17%
DFAC 53.9×the volume
37.2K2M
AESR +0.6pt
+11.7%+11.1%
AESR vs DFAC Performance
+73.7%+69.4%
- AESR 0.97%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- AESR $246M
- DFAC $87.7B
- AESR +11.4%
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- AESR 20.49%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- AESR 33
- DFAC 2553
- AESR 37.2K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- AESR $19.05
- DFAC $44.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AESR | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A94Higher |
| Mission | C48 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D39 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A77 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. AESR and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AESRD
DFACA
In short
AESR A macro call in ETF form: AESR ranks the S&P 500's 11 sectors, then holds eight to ten sector funds in whatever mix its outlook favors. No index leash, quarterly resets, and a bill that reflects the hands-on work.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
AESR The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is actively managed, invests in U.S. equity securities directly or through underlying ETFs, and uses macroeconomic analysis to adjust exposure among equity-market sectors.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AESR vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AESR vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying AESR vs DFAC
$14,652
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AESR 0.97%
$18,198
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AESR | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $310 | $1,402 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $1,211 | $5,232 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $3,546 | $14,652 |
- 0.97%AESR
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
AESR 102nd cheapest of 121 funds
AESR vs DFAC Dividends
- AESR 20.49%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- AESR $3.90
- DFAC $0.39
- AESR $3.90
- DFAC $0.10
- AESR Dec 12, 2025
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- AESR Dec 15, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- AESR Twice a year
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
AESR vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AESR
- DFAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AESR 15.7%DFAC 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AESR 1.28DFAC 1.32, better
- Worst fall
- AESR −25.0%DFAC −23.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AESR 1.17DFAC 0.99
AESR and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.