FESM ranks 2nd and AFSC 27th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
AFSC vs FESM
FESM −0.37pt a year
0.65%0.28%
FESM 2087.4×the volume
4881.02M
AFSC vs FESM Performance
+23.2%+23.4%
- AFSC 0.65%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- AFSC $10M
- FESM $6.41B
- AFSC +23.2%
- FESM +23.4%, better
- AFSC
- FESM 0.86%
- AFSC 42
- FESM 892
- AFSC 488 sh
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- AFSC $36.46
- FESM $45.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFSC | FESM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | D29 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. AFSC and FESM are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFSCC
FESMA
In short
AFSC A 1997-vintage Aberdeen stock-picking strategy that swapped its mutual fund shell for an ETF wrapper in 2025. It chases long-term capital appreciation through roughly 35 to 45 U.S. small caps, so every name actually counts.
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
Stated mandate
AFSC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of U.S. small-cap companies. It uses a focused approach that typically holds a small number of issuers.
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFSC vs FESM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFSC vs FESM Cost
Overpaying AFSC vs FESM
$6,962
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFSC 0.65%
$12,717
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFSC | FESM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $509 | $654 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,976 | $2,464 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $5,755 | $6,962 |
- 0.65%AFSC
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
AFSC 24th cheapest of 39 funds
AFSC vs FESM Dividends
- AFSC
- FESM 0.86%
- AFSC
- FESM $0.39
- AFSC $0.02
- FESM $0.10
- AFSC Dec 19, 2025
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- AFSC Dec 24, 2025
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- AFSC Irregular
- FESM Quarterly
Distribution history
AFSC vs FESM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFSC 17.5%FESM 19.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AFSC 0.79FESM 0.97
- Worst fall
- AFSC −21.7%FESM −26.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AFSC 1.17FESM 1.34
AFSC and FESM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
