FESM ranks 2nd and AFSM 21st of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
AFSM vs FESM
FESM −0.47pt a year
0.75%0.28%
FESM 60.4×the volume
17.5K1.06M
AFSM vs FESM Performance
+22.5%+25.8%
- AFSM 0.75%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- AFSM $129M
- FESM $6.74B
- AFSM +22.5%
- FESM +25.8%, better
- AFSM 0.52%
- FESM 0.86%, better
- AFSM 320
- FESM 895
- AFSM 17.5K sh
- FESM 1.06M sh, better
- AFSM $37.88
- FESM $45.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFSM | FESM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B55 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. AFSM and FESM are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFSMC
FESMA
In short
AFSM Active management in index-fund clothing. AFSM runs a multi-factor quant model across roughly 300 U.S. small caps, so you get a manager's screens with broad diversification instead of a concentrated stock-picker's book.
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
Stated mandate
AFSM The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in U.S.-listed equity securities of small-capitalization companies through an actively managed, multi-factor quantitative approach.
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFSM vs FESM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFSM vs FESM Cost
Overpaying AFSM vs FESM
$8,727
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFSM 0.75%
$14,482
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFSM | FESM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $509 | $827 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,976 | $3,102 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $5,755 | $8,727 |
- 0.75%AFSM
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
AFSM 29th cheapest of 39 funds
AFSM vs FESM Dividends
- AFSM 0.52%
- FESM 0.86%, better
- AFSM $0.20
- FESM $0.39
- AFSM $0.02
- FESM $0.10
- AFSM Sep 24, 2026
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- AFSM Sep 30, 2026
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- AFSM Quarterly
- FESM Quarterly
Distribution history
AFSM vs FESM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFSM 17.7%FESM 19.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AFSM 0.93FESM 0.97
- Worst fall
- AFSM −28.3%FESM −26.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AFSM 1.05FESM 1.33
AFSM and FESM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
