IUSB ranks 2nd and AGGH 93rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGGH vs IUSB
IUSB −0.37pt a year
0.43%0.06%
IUSB 18.2×the volume
337K6.13M
IUSB +0.2pt
+5.6%+5.8%
AGGH vs IUSB Performance
−0.2%0.0%
- AGGH 0.43%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- AGGH $416M
- IUSB $50.2B
- AGGH −0.2%
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- AGGH 7.63%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- AGGH 9
- IUSB 18280
- AGGH 337K sh
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- AGGH $19.21
- IUSB $44.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGGH | IUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGGH and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGHC
IUSBA
In short
AGGH Core bonds with a twist: an investment-grade bond core built mostly from other ETFs, then options layered on top to hedge risk or generate income. The active take on the Agg, for people who find the index version too plain.
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
Stated mandate
AGGH The Fund seeks to maximize total return. It invests primarily in investment-grade bonds, chiefly through exchange-traded funds, and uses derivative overlays to hedge risk or generate income.
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGGH vs IUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGGH vs IUSB Cost
Overpaying AGGH vs IUSB
$7,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGGH 0.43%
$8,662
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGGH | IUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $776 | $110 | $666 |
| 20 | $2,994 | $432 | $2,562 |
| 30 | $8,662 | $1,270 | $7,392 |
- 0.43%AGGH
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
AGGH 82nd cheapest of 114 funds
AGGH vs IUSB Dividends
- AGGH 7.63%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- AGGH $1.47
- IUSB $1.94
- AGGH $0.12
- IUSB $0.15
- AGGH Oct 27, 2026
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- AGGH Oct 30, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- AGGH Monthly
- IUSB Monthly
Distribution history
AGGH vs IUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGGH 7.2%IUSB 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AGGH 0.17IUSB 0.25, better
- Worst fall
- AGGH −13.2%IUSB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AGGH 1.12IUSB 0.96
AGGH and IUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

