AINP ranks 2nd and FOPC 22nd of 23 funds in the Multi-Sector Bond Income Category.
AINP vs FOPC
0.0%by weight
AINP −0.51pt a year
0.36%0.87%
FOPC 1.3×the volume
5.77K7.22K
AINP vs FOPC Performance
+2.0%+0.5%
- AINP 0.36%, better
- FOPC 0.87%
- AINP $251M
- FOPC $32M
- AINP +2.0%, better
- FOPC +0.5%
- AINP 5.80%, better
- FOPC 4.45%
- AINP 428
- FOPC 9
- AINP 5.77K sh
- FOPC 7.22K sh, better
- AINP $24.39
- FOPC $24.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AINP | FOPC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | F22 | C41Higher |
| Holdings | B55Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B68Higher | F24 |
Rank among Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
Same Category. AINP and FOPC are both graded against the same 23 Multi-Sector Bond Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
AINP vs FOPC Holdings
How AINP and FOPC differ
0.0%
About this figure: FOPC holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector79.4%
- Country80.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in AINPMore in FOPC | Gap | AINP | FOPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government | FOPC +20.5 points | 24.2% | 44.7% | |
| Corporate | AINP +14.5 points | 41.9% | 27.4% | |
| Securitized | AINP +6.0 points | 33.9% | 27.9% | |
| Municipal | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AINPMore in FOPC | Gap | AINP | FOPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FOPC +19.5 points | 80.5% | 100.0% | |
| Colombia | AINP +3.0 points | 3.0% | 0.0% | |
| Australia | AINP +2.7 points | 2.7% | 0.0% | |
| France | AINP +2.5 points | 2.5% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | AINP +2.4 points | 2.4% | 0.0% | |
| Brazil | AINP +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Italy | AINP +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Belgium | AINP +1.1 points | 1.1% | 0.0% | |
| Other countries (7) | AINP +4.2 points | 4.2% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AINP40.6%
- FOPC100.0%
- AINP355
- FOPC8
Asset class
- AINP
- Bonds
- FOPC
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AINP355
- In both0
- Only in FOPC8
Only in AINP
355 securities, 100% of AINP by weight
- Ginnie Mae 04/20/20567.91%
- Umbs Tba 30yr 5% November Delivery7.76%
- Umbs Tba 30yr 6% November Delivery7.06%
- U.S. Treasuries6.54%
- Umbs Tba 30yr November Delivery5.04%
- Government of Colombia3.24%
- Government of Australia2.94%
- Government of United Kingdom2.57%
- Government of France2.45%
- Allspring Govt Mmkt2.42%
- Fhlmc2.33%
- Government of Brazil2.00%
- Government of Italy1.96%
- Gnma1.63%
- Government of Mexico1.59%
- GNMA Series Association- Class1.22%
- Government of Norway1.01%
- Government of Peru0.98%
- Government of Belgium0.97%
- Government of South Africa0.96%
- Fnma0.85%
- Global Payments Inc.0.68%
- Centersquare Issuer Llc Cnsq 2024 1A A2 144A0.62%
- Scf Equipment Leasing 2026-1 LLC0.58%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.0.58%
- Morgan Stanley0.53%
- PetSmart LLC0.47%
- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.45%
- Elfi Graduate Loan Program Llc Elfi 2026 A A 144A0.45%
- Umbs Tba 15yr November Delivery0.43%
- Blue Owl Capital Corporation0.42%
- Banco Mercantil Del Norte Sa (grand Cayman Branch) Perp0.42%
- Subway Funding Series 2024-30.41%
- Wintershall Dea FinanceBv Perp0.40%
- Avant Loans Funding Trust Avnt 2024 REV1 B 144A0.40%
- Jp Morgan Mortgage Trust Jpmmt 2025 CES1 A3 144A0.40%
- Athene Global Funding0.39%
- LevelFinancing, Inc.0.39%
- Beach Acquisition Bidco, LLC0.38%
- Chemours Company0.38%
- Verus Securitization Trust 2024-90.38%
- Bp Capital Markets P.l.c. Perp0.37%
- Jack In The Box Funding 2019-10.36%
- DNB Bank ASA0.36%
- Government of Trinidad & Tobago0.36%
- Raiffeisen Bank International AG0.35%
- Var Energi ASA0.35%
- Aegis Lux 1A S.a r.l.0.35%
- Bankinter SA0.35%
- Oracle Corporation0.35%
Only in FOPC
8 securities, 98.8% of FOPC by weight
- Tcw Flexible Income Etf25.16%
- Vanguard Intermediate-Term T16.69%
- Ishares Investment Grade Sys15.93%
- JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Etf15.11%
- Schwab U.s. Tips Etf7.79%
- Ishares Mbs Etf6.99%
- Vanguard Short-Term Tips6.40%
- Pimco Multisector Bond Actv4.75%
Weight gaps
AINP and FOPC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AINP vs FOPC Cost
Overpaying FOPC vs AINP
$9,216
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AINP 0.36%
$7,320
FOPC 0.87%
$16,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AINP | FOPC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $1,542 | $890 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $5,830 | $3,308 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $16,536 | $9,216 |
- 0.36%AINP, cheaper
- 0.87%FOPC
- Middle half of Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
- Median 0.60%
AINP 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
FOPC 19th cheapest of 23 funds
AINP vs FOPC Dividends
- AINP 5.80%, better
- FOPC 4.45%
- AINP $1.42
- FOPC $1.11
- AINP $0.07
- FOPC $0.30
- AINP Oct 23, 2026
- FOPC Sep 29, 2026
- AINP Oct 27, 2026
- FOPC Oct 6, 2026
- AINP Monthly
- FOPC Quarterly
Distribution history
AINP vs FOPC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AINP 3.2%FOPC 3.2%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- AINP 0.08FOPC −0.22
- Worst fall
- AINP −2.9%FOPC −3.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AINP 0.11FOPC 0.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.