USCA ranks 2nd and ALTL 28th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
ALTL vs USCA
USCA −0.53pt a year
0.60%0.07%
USCA 12.1×the volume
8.06K97.9K
USCA +12.8pt
+7.7%+20.5%
ALTL vs USCA Performance
−12.2%+7.7%
- ALTL 0.60%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- ALTL $73M
- USCA $3.42B
- ALTL −12.2%
- USCA +7.7%, better
- ALTL 1.53%, better
- USCA 1.05%
- ALTL 100
- USCA 392
- ALTL 8.06K sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- ALTL $39.27
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ALTL | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | F14 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A80Higher | D29 |
| Durability | F13 | C49Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. ALTL and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ALTLD
USCAA
In short
ALTL Most factor funds blend their bets. ALTL flips a switch: each month it holds either the S&P 500's 100 lowest-volatility names or its 100 highest-beta ones, never both, based on a relative-strength signal.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
ALTL ALTL seeks to track an index that alternates between low-volatility and high-beta stocks within the S&P 500. The rules-based index rotates monthly using a relative-strength signal.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ALTL vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ALTL vs USCA Cost
Overpaying ALTL vs USCA
$10,337
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ALTL 0.60%
$11,817
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ALTL | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $128 | $948 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $503 | $3,613 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,480 | $10,337 |
- 0.60%ALTL
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
ALTL 27th cheapest of 30 funds
ALTL vs USCA Dividends
- ALTL 1.53%, better
- USCA 1.05%
- ALTL $0.59
- USCA $0.47
- ALTL $0.20
- USCA $0.10
- ALTL Sep 3, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- ALTL Sep 8, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- ALTL Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
ALTL vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ALTL 16.8%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ALTL 0.33USCA 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- ALTL −31.9%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ALTL 0.81USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.