UNHG ranks 2nd and AMDG 5th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMDG vs UNHG
12.0%by weight
UNHG −0.01pt a year
0.78%0.77%
UNHG 14.9×the volume
48.7K726K
AMDG vs UNHG Performance
+112.2%+11.9%
- AMDG 0.78%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- AMDG $21M
- UNHG $63M
- AMDG +112.2%, better
- UNHG +11.9%
- AMDG 5
- UNHG 5
- AMDG 48.7K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- AMDG $86.07
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMDG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | B60 |
| Mission | A91Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A73 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A85 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMDG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMDGB
UNHGA
In short
AMDG The low-cost way to rent 2x AMD. Total return swaps with several banks, rebalanced at every close, targeting double AMD's daily move, at a flat 0.78% with no waiver.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
AMDG The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. stock (AMD).
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMDG vs UNHG Holdings
How AMDG and UNHG differ
12.0%
Shared holdings make up 19.9% of AMDG and 12.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings12.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMDG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMDGMore in UNHG | AMDG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMDG219.9%
- UNHG212.0%
- AMDG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- AMDG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AMDG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in AMDG
0 securities, 0.0% of AMDG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AMDGMore in UNHG | AMDG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | AMDG +7.90 points | 19.89% | 11.99% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMDG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying AMDG vs UNHG
$173
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMDG 0.78%
$15,002
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMDG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,371 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,205 | $63 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,829 | $173 |
- 0.78%AMDG
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
AMDG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
AMDG vs UNHG Dividends
- AMDG $2.97
- UNHG $1.90
- AMDG Dec 30, 2025
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- AMDG Jan 2, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- AMDG Irregular
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
AMDG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMDG 206.3%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMDG 1.20UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AMDG −63.0%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AMDG 5.60UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.