ICSH ranks 1st and ARCM 64th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ARCM vs ICSH
ICSH −0.42pt a year
0.50%0.08%
ICSH 4153.4×the volume
3961.64M
ICSH +0.4pt
+3.5%+3.9%
ARCM vs ICSH Performance
+18.5%+21.3%
- ARCM 0.50%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- ARCM $51M
- ICSH $8.97B
- ARCM +3.3%
- ICSH +3.6%, better
- ARCM 3.87%
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- ARCM 103
- ICSH 408
- ARCM 396 sh
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- ARCM $100.24
- ICSH $50.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARCM | ICSH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A95Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A90Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ARCM and ICSH are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARCMC
ICSHA
In short
ARCM Arrow's boutique take on cash parking, running since 2017: preserve capital, collect current income, pay monthly. The trade-off is a 0.50% fee in a corner of the bond market where the giants charge a fraction of that.
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
ARCM The Fund seeks to preserve capital while maximizing current income.
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARCM vs ICSH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARCM vs ICSH Cost
Overpaying ARCM vs ICSH
$8,290
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARCM 0.50%
$9,979
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARCM | ICSH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $147 | $753 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $575 | $2,885 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,689 | $8,290 |
- 0.50%ARCM
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
ARCM 76th cheapest of 78 funds
ARCM vs ICSH Dividends
- ARCM 3.87%
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- ARCM $3.87
- ICSH $2.08
- ARCM $0.31
- ICSH $0.17
- ARCM Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- ARCM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- ARCM Monthly
- ICSH Monthly
Distribution history
ARCM vs ICSH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ARCM
- ICSH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARCM 0.4%ICSH 0.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- ARCM −0.34ICSH 0.87, better
- Worst fall
- ARCM −3.5%ICSH −0.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ARCM 0.03ICSH 0.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.