XHLF ranks 4th and ARCM 64th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ARCM vs XHLF
XHLF −0.47pt a year
0.50%0.03%
XHLF 780.2×the volume
396309K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+4.4%+4.4%
ARCM vs XHLF Performance
+3.3%+3.6%
- ARCM 0.50%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- ARCM $51M
- XHLF $2.03B
- ARCM +3.3%
- XHLF +3.6%, better
- ARCM 3.87%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- ARCM 103
- XHLF 29
- ARCM 396 sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- ARCM $100.24
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARCM | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | B63Higher | D35 |
| Durability | C47 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ARCM and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARCMC
XHLFA
In short
ARCM Arrow's boutique take on cash parking, running since 2017: preserve capital, collect current income, pay monthly. The trade-off is a 0.50% fee in a corner of the bond market where the giants charge a fraction of that.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
ARCM The Fund seeks to preserve capital while maximizing current income.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARCM vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARCM vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying ARCM vs XHLF
$9,341
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARCM 0.50%
$9,979
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARCM | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $55 | $845 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $216 | $3,244 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $638 | $9,341 |
- 0.50%ARCM
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
ARCM 76th cheapest of 78 funds
ARCM vs XHLF Dividends
- ARCM 3.87%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- ARCM $3.87
- XHLF $1.89
- ARCM $0.31
- XHLF $0.15
- ARCM Oct 30, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- ARCM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- ARCM Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
ARCM vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARCM 0.4%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ARCM −0.34, betterXHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- ARCM −3.5%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ARCM 0.03XHLF 0.03Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.