Skip to content

ARLI vs QBIF

AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF

ARLICCboe

AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

QBIFBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QBIF −0.05pt a year

ARLI0.79%QBIF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

QBIF 3.9×the volume

ARLI739QBIF2.9K

ARLI vs QBIF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.4%ARLI−0.9%QBIF

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. ARLI −2.4%. QBIF −0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ARLI 0.79%
QBIF 0.74%, better
Fund size
ARLI $8M
QBIF $9M
Holdings
ARLI 2
QBIF 3
Avg volume (30D)
ARLI 739 sh
QBIF 2.9K sh, better
NAV per share
ARLI $25.69
QBIF $25.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARLI: Cost 68, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings 65, Durability 22. QBIF: Cost 78, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 55, Durability 26.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARLI, QBIF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARLIQBIF
Cost30% weightB68A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24A76Higher
Tradability15% weightF16D35Higher
Holdings10% weightB65HigherB55
Durability5% weightF22D26Higher

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARLI and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 26 ›

QBIF ranks 2nd and ARLI 16th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 15CIDECInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 16CARLIAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 16CIMARInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 42

ARLI vs QBIF Holdings

How ARLI and QBIF differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ARLI and 0.0% of QBIF.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in ARLI and QBIF, widest gap first
SectorMore in ARLIMore in QBIF
FinancialsSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
TechnologySame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
MaterialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARLI and QBIF, widest gap first
CountryMore in ARLIMore in QBIF
JapanSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
GermanySame weight
FranceSame weight
AustraliaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
SpainSame weight
Other countries (17)Same weight

Outside the US: ARLI 99% developed, 1% emerging. QBIF 99% developed, 1% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ARLI100.9%
  • QBIF101.4%

Securities held

  • ARLI2
  • QBIF2

Asset class

ARLI
Equity
QBIF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ARLI2
  • In both0
  • Only in QBIF2

Only in ARLI

2 securities, 100% of ARLI by weight

  • Efa 03/31/2027 5.32 C97.66%
  • Efa 03/31/2027 101.72 P3.28%

Only in QBIF

2 securities, 100% of QBIF by weight

  • Efa 12/31/2026 0.78 C98.11%
  • Efa 12/31/2026 103.88 P2.74%

Weight gaps

ARLI and QBIF share no securities.

All 4 ARLI holdings⁠All 5 QBIF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARLI vs QBIF Cost

Overpaying ARLI vs QBIF

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARLI 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QBIF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARLI 0.79%
  • QBIF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ARLI $15,174QBIF $14,307

Year by year

YearARLIQBIFOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%ARLI
  • 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds

ARLI 8th cheapest of 26 funds

ARLI vs QBIF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
ARLI None
QBIF None

Distribution history

ARLIAll ARLI payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBIFAll QBIF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARLI vs QBIF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARLI 0.17QBIF 0.03

Popular comparisons

  • ARLICvsBUFIB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsBUFIB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARLICvsIAUGB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsIAUGB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARLICvsIJULB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsIJULB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.