WTV ranks 1st and ASLV 23rd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
ASLV vs WTV
WTV −0.23pt a year
0.35%0.12%
WTV 19.7×the volume
8.52K167K
ASLV vs WTV Performance
+14.2%+20.9%
- ASLV 0.35%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- ASLV $206M
- WTV $3.33B
- ASLV +14.2%
- WTV +20.9%, better
- ASLV
- WTV 2.00%
- ASLV 46
- WTV 126
- ASLV 8.52K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- ASLV $30.93
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASLV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | D38 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. ASLV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASLVB
WTVA
In short
ASLV An active large-cap value fund that runs a short bench: about 50 names, not 500. Allspring prices it well below the typical active value ETF, though the fund only opened its doors in 2025.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
ASLV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASLV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASLV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying ASLV vs WTV
$4,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASLV 0.35%
$7,126
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASLV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $220 | $414 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $859 | $1,595 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $2,520 | $4,606 |
- 0.35%ASLV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
ASLV 15th cheapest of 64 funds
ASLV vs WTV Dividends
- ASLV
- WTV 2.00%
- ASLV
- WTV $2.14
- ASLV $0.24
- WTV $0.55
- ASLV Dec 22, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- ASLV Dec 24, 2025
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- ASLV Irregular
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
ASLV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASLV 10.8%WTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASLV 1.08WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- ASLV −11.0%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ASLV 0.56WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.