AUGP ranks 2nd and PQV 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGP vs PQV
0.9%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
AUGP 25.2×the volume
7.35K292
AUGP vs PQV Performance
+1.4%+1.1%
- AUGP 0.50%
- PQV 0.50%
- AUGP $38M
- PQV $2M
- AUGP +10.3%
- PQV
- AUGP 4
- PQV 4
- AUGP 7.35K sh, better
- PQV 292 sh
- AUGP $34.23
- PQV $25.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGP | PQV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91 | A91 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | F24Higher | F1 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38Higher | F18 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGP and PQV are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
AUGP vs PQV Holdings
How AUGP and PQV differ
0.9%
Shared holdings make up 2.3% of PQV and 0.9% of AUGP.
Level by level
- Holdings0.9%
Sector
No Sector split for AUGP and PQV.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AUGPMore in PQV | AUGP | PQV |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AUGP103.3%
- PQV101.5%
- AUGP3
- PQV3
Asset class
- AUGP
- Alternatives
- PQV
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in AUGP2
- In both1
- Only in PQV2
Only in AUGP
2 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.85%
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.033.59%
Only in PQV
2 securities, 99.3% of PQV by weight
- 4SPY Us 12/31/26 C15.2597.50%
- 4SPY Us 12/31/26 P762.631.75%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AUGPMore in PQV | AUGP | PQV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Current Assets | Same weight | <0.01% | <0.01% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGP vs PQV Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
PQV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGP | PQV |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%AUGP
- 0.50%PQV
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds
PQV 5th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGP vs PQV Dividends
- AUGP None
- PQV None
Distribution history
AUGP vs PQV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGP 6.2%PQV
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGP 1.31PQV
- Worst fall
- AUGP −11.1%PQV
- Market sensitivity
- AUGP 0.53PQV 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.