Skip to content
etf.net

AUGP vs STEN

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF

STENBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUGP −0.03pt a year

AUGP0.50%STEN0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

STEN 1.8×the volume

AUGP7.35KSTEN13.5K

AUGP vs STEN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.3%AUGP+11.8%STEN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGP +10.3%. STEN +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGP 0.50%, better
STEN 0.53%
Fund size
AUGP $38M
STEN $58M
1Y total return
AUGP +10.3%
STEN +11.8%, better
Holdings
AUGP 4
STEN 4
Avg volume (30D)
AUGP 7.35K sh
STEN 13.5K sh, better
NAV per share
AUGP $34.23
STEN $28.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGP: Cost 91, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. STEN: Cost 86, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 51, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, STEN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGPSTEN
Cost30% weightA91HigherA86
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherC40
Tradability15% weightF24D38Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC51
Durability5% weightD38C48Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGP and STEN are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 2nd and STEN 16th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 16BFEBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 16BSTENiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 18BDECTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETFScore 58

AUGP vs STEN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs STEN Cost

Overpaying STEN vs AUGP

$557

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • STEN 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGP 0.50%
  • STEN 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530STEN $10,536AUGP $9,979

Year by year

YearAUGPSTENOverpaying
10$900$953$53
20$3,460$3,658$198
30$9,979$10,536$557

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
  • 0.53%STEN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

STEN 11th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs STEN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGP None
STEN No data
Last payment
AUGP No data
STEN $0.08
Ex-dividend
AUGP No data
STEN Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
AUGP No data
STEN Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
AUGP No data
STEN Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

STENIrregular · 1 paymentAll STEN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD

AUGP vs STEN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024STEN 9.3%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024STEN 0.83since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGP −11.1%since May 2024STEN −6.2%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGP 0.53STEN 0.69

Popular comparisons

  • AUGPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • STENBvsZALTA

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsTENJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • STENBvsTENJB

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsSIXJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • STENBvsSIXJB

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.