ZALT ranks 1st and AUGT 32nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGT vs ZALT
ZALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
ZALT 45.0×the volume
3.07K138K
AUGT +7.7pt
+18.3%+10.6%
AUGT vs ZALT Performance
+10.8%+7.1%
- AUGT 0.74%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- AUGT $36M
- ZALT $840M
- AUGT +10.8%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- AUGT 2
- ZALT 503
- AUGT 3.07K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- AUGT $39.50
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A80 |
| Risk | B58 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C40 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGTC
ZALTA
In short
AUGT A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500. It absorbs the first 10% of the decline in the big S&P 500 ETF it references and gives up gains above a cap that resets annually, all for 0.74% a year, below the shallow-buffer median.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
AUGT The fund seeks to match SPY’s share-price return over a one-year outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of SPY losses.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGT vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGT vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying AUGT vs ZALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGT 0.74%
$14,307
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGT | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%AUGT
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGT vs ZALT Dividends
- AUGT None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
AUGT vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGT 8.0%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGT 1.61, betterZALT 1.50
- Worst fall
- AUGT −13.1%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGT 0.65ZALT 0.29
AUGT and ZALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
