Skip to content

AUGT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF

AUGTCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

AUGT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 45.0×the volume

AUGT3.07KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

AUGT +7.7pt

AUGT+18.3%ZALT+10.6%

AUGT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.8%AUGT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGT +10.8%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
AUGT $36M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
AUGT +10.8%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
AUGT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
AUGT 3.07K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
AUGT $39.50
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGT: Cost 68, Risk 58, Mission 100, Tradability 27, Holdings 52, Durability 40. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA80
Risk15% weightB58A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD27B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC52A90Higher
Durability5% weightC40B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and AUGT 32nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 32BBJULInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGTCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

AUGT A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500. It absorbs the first 10% of the decline in the big S&P 500 ETF it references and gives up gains above a cap that resets annually, all for 0.74% a year, below the shallow-buffer median.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

AUGT The fund seeks to match SPY’s share-price return over a one-year outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of SPY losses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • AUGT At 0.74% it undercuts the 0.79% median for shallow-buffer funds, including August-dated peer BAUG. Fee drag comes straight out of the cap you get.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 ETF itself, not an abstract index, and the buffer absorbs the first 10% of its share-price decline over the outcome period.
  • AllianzIM runs the same 10% structure in other calendar months (JULT, SEPT, OCTT) at the same fee, and this one sits in the upper half of its peer group.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • AUGT The cap is reset for each new outcome period off option prices at the time, so the ceiling shifts from year to year and is not known in advance.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap remain, not the headline 10%. The stated terms describe a hold from one reset to the next.
  • Thinly traded on a small asset base, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full AUGT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

AUGT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying AUGT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AUGT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearAUGTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%AUGT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

AUGTAll AUGT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGT 8.0%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGT 1.61, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGT −13.1%since Aug 2023ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGT 0.65ZALT 0.29

AUGT and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUGTCvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGTCvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGTCvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.