Skip to content

AUGW vs BALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF

AUGWCCboe

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

AUGW0.74%BALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 28.8×the volume

AUGW19.8KBALT569K

3Y return · a year

AUGW +5.0pt

AUGW+13.0%BALT+8.0%

AUGW vs BALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.0%AUGW+5.9%BALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGW +8.0%. BALT +5.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGW 0.74%
BALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
AUGW $128M
BALT $3.47B
1Y total return
AUGW +8.0%, better
BALT +5.9%
Holdings
AUGW 2
BALT 3
Avg volume (30D)
AUGW 19.8K sh
BALT 569K sh, better
NAV per share
AUGW $34.97
BALT $34.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGW: Cost 37, Risk 57, Mission 100, Tradability 48, Holdings 61, Durability 41. BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGW, BALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGWBALT
Cost30% weightD37B65Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA78
Risk15% weightB57B65Higher
Tradability15% weightC48B66Higher
Holdings10% weightB61Not scored
Durability5% weightC41A82Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGW and BALT are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and AUGW 17th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47
  4. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

In short

AUGW AUGW is the August rung of a twelve-fund ladder: a year of S&P 500 exposure up to a cap, with the first 20% of losses absorbed. Built by the in-house hedging desk behind Allianz Life's annuities, priced at the going rate for deep buffers.

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

Stated mandate

AUGW The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over an outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

Why people hold it

  • AUGW Deep end of the shelf: the first 20% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over the one-year period are absorbed before fees, double the 10% tier AllianzIM sells alongside it.allianzim.com
  • The hedging is in-house. AllianzIM is Allianz Life's own investment arm and runs these funds on the proprietary platform its affiliates use for hedged assets.allianzlife.com
  • Resets each August 1 with a fresh 20% buffer and a newly struck cap, and it has monthly siblings across the calendar, so entry dates can be spread out.allianzim.com
  • Plumbing is straightforward: FLEX options written on SPY itself, and the payoff has matched the buffer-and-cap shape its own documents describe.allianzim.com
  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.

Worth knowing

  • AUGW At 0.74% the fee sits right at the deep-buffer median, and cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PSFJ and PSFM at 0.49%, PBFR at 0.50%.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so the bid-ask spread you cross is part of what the protection costs.
  • Upside stops at the cap and the buffer is measured from the August 1 start, so mid-period buyers work with different math than the headline terms.allianzim.com
  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.

Full AUGW profile⁠

Full BALT profile⁠

AUGW vs BALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGW vs BALT Cost

Overpaying AUGW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGW 0.74%
  • BALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AUGW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearAUGWBALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%AUGW
  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

AUGW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

AUGW vs BALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGW None
BALT None

Distribution history

AUGWAll AUGW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGW vs BALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGW 5.2%BALT 2.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGW 1.55, betterBALT 1.37
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGW −8.8%since Aug 2023BALT −4.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGW 0.41BALT 0.18

Popular comparisons

  • AUGWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.