BALT ranks 1st and AUGW 17th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
AUGW vs BALT
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
BALT 28.8×the volume
19.8K569K
AUGW +5.0pt
+13.0%+8.0%
AUGW vs BALT Performance
+8.0%+5.9%
- AUGW 0.74%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- AUGW $128M
- BALT $3.47B
- AUGW +8.0%, better
- BALT +5.9%
- AUGW 2
- BALT 3
- AUGW 19.8K sh
- BALT 569K sh, better
- AUGW $34.97
- BALT $34.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGW | BALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | B65Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A78 |
| Risk | B57 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | |
| Durability | C41 | A82Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. AUGW and BALT are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGWC
BALTB
In short
AUGW AUGW is the August rung of a twelve-fund ladder: a year of S&P 500 exposure up to a cap, with the first 20% of losses absorbed. Built by the in-house hedging desk behind Allianz Life's annuities, priced at the going rate for deep buffers.
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
Stated mandate
AUGW The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over an outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGW vs BALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGW vs BALT Cost
Overpaying AUGW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGW 0.74%
$14,307
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGW | BALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%AUGW
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
AUGW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
AUGW vs BALT Dividends
- AUGW None
- BALT None
Distribution history
AUGW vs BALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGW 5.2%BALT 2.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGW 1.55, betterBALT 1.37
- Worst fall
- AUGW −8.8%BALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGW 0.41BALT 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.