Skip to content

AUGZ vs ZALT

TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF

AUGZDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

AUGZ0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 47.1×the volume

AUGZ2.88KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

AUGZ +5.1pt

AUGZ+14.7%ZALT+9.6%

AUGZ vs ZALT Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+5.9%AUGZ+6.0%ZALT

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. AUGZ +5.9%. ZALT +6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AUGZ 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
AUGZ $44M
ZALT $845M
1Y total return
AUGZ +5.9%
ZALT +6.0%, better
Yield (12M)
AUGZ 3.44%
ZALT No data
Holdings
AUGZ 6
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
AUGZ 2.88K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
AUGZ $46.10
ZALT $34.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGZ: Cost 40, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings not scored, Durability 52. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 80, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGZ, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGZZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightD25A80Higher
Tradability15% weightD29B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightC52B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and AUGZ 72nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 70DFEBZTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETFScore 35
  4. Rank 72DAUGZTrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 72DMARZTrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGZDTrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

AUGZ TrueShares pioneered the uncapped buffer format in 2020, and AUGZ is the August entry: it buffers the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price-index losses over each 12-month period, with no preset ceiling on the upside.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

AUGZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while using an options strategy to buffer the first 8% to 12% of index losses over each 12-month August investment period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • AUGZ The uncapped original. TrueShares launched this no-hard-cap format in 2020; most buffer funds trade their downside cushion for a ceiling on gains.true-shares.com
  • Plain machinery: calls bought and puts sold on the S&P 500 price index, buffering the first 8% to 12% of losses (the adviser targets 10%) each August-to-July period.sec.govtrue-shares.com
  • Ten sibling funds reset in different months, from JANZ through DECZ, so the August start date is a choice rather than the only door in.true-shares.com
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • AUGZ The 0.79% fee, with no waiver attached, lands near the category norm but above AUGP's 0.50% on the same August cycle, PQX at 0.50% and ZALT at 0.69%.
  • The buffer is a target range measured before fees across the full 12-month period, not a promise; buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion is left.sec.gov
  • Options reference the price index, so S&P 500 dividends sit outside the payoff, and the cost of the options trims how much of a rally comes through.sec.gov
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full AUGZ profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

AUGZ vs ZALT Holdings

How AUGZ and ZALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.0%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

Sector weights in AUGZ and ZALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in AUGZMore in ZALTGap
CommunicationAUGZ +1.6 points
Health CareZALT +1.2 points
EnergyZALT +0.9 points
IndustrialsAUGZ +0.8 points
FinancialsZALT +0.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryAUGZ +0.4 points
TechnologyZALT +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesZALT +0.3 points
UtilitiesAUGZ +0.2 points
Real EstateAUGZ +0.1 points
MaterialsAUGZ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AUGZ and ZALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in AUGZMore in ZALTGap
United StatesAUGZ +0.5 points
SwitzerlandZALT +0.3 points
ChinaZALT +0.1 points
MexicoZALT +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AUGZ102.1%
  • ZALT37.5%

Securities held

  • AUGZ3
  • ZALT503

Asset class

AUGZ
Stocks
ZALT
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in AUGZ3
  • In both0
  • Only in ZALT503

Only in AUGZ

3 securities, 94.6% of AUGZ by weight

  • Treasury Bill B 07/08/2794.28%
  • Broker Sweep0.19%
  • State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.09%

Only in ZALT

503 securities, 100% of ZALT by weight

  • Apple Inc7.65%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.26%
  • Microsoft Corp6.19%

Weight gaps

AUGZ and ZALT share no securities.

All 7 AUGZ holdings⁠All ZALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGZ vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying AUGZ vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGZ 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530AUGZ $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearAUGZZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%AUGZ
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGZ vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUGZ 3.44%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
AUGZ $1.53
ZALT None
Last payment
AUGZ $1.53
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
AUGZ Dec 24, 2025
ZALT No data
Paid on
AUGZ Dec 26, 2025
ZALT No data
Frequency
AUGZ Annual
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

AUGZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll AUGZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.12; Dec 27, 2023 $1.16; Dec 27, 2024 $1.57; Dec 24, 2025 $1.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGZ vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGZ 9.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGZ 1.20ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGZ −15.7%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGZ 0.73ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • AUGZDvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGZDvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGZDvsBUFMB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsBUFMB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.