AVES ranks 2nd and EQLT 11th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
AVES vs EQLT
EQLT −0.01pt a year
0.36%0.35%
AVES 68.3×the volume
99.4K1.46K
AVES vs EQLT Performance
+8.1%+15.3%
- AVES 0.36%
- EQLT 0.35%, better
- AVES $1.45B
- EQLT $11M
- AVES +8.1%
- EQLT +15.3%, better
- AVES 3.70%, better
- EQLT 2.65%
- AVES 2007
- EQLT 313
- AVES 99.4K sh, better
- EQLT 1.46K sh
- AVES $58.84
- EQLT $33.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVES | EQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | B68 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B57Higher | D27 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. AVES and EQLT are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVESA
EQLTC
In short
AVES Avantis starts with the emerging markets universe and tilts it: cheap valuations, profitable companies, roughly 1,800 names from megacaps down to small caps. Broad EM exposure with a deliberate value-and-quality slant, priced under the typical multifactor rival.
EQLT Most emerging-market factor funds blend several signals together. EQLT picks one and commits: quality. It tracks an MSCI index of roughly 300 large- and mid-cap EM companies screened for high profitability, low debt and steady earnings, for 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
AVES The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
EQLT The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap emerging-market stocks selected for high profitability, low leverage, and earnings consistency.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVES vs EQLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVES vs EQLT Cost
Overpaying AVES vs EQLT
$194
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVES 0.36%
$7,320
EQLT 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVES | EQLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $634 | $18 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $2,454 | $68 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $7,126 | $194 |
- 0.36%AVES
- 0.35%EQLT, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EQLT 6th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES 8th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES vs EQLT Dividends
- AVES 3.70%, better
- EQLT 2.65%
- AVES $2.23
- EQLT $0.90
- AVES $0.62
- EQLT $0.28
- AVES Sep 8, 2026
- EQLT Jun 15, 2026
- AVES Sep 10, 2026
- EQLT Jun 18, 2026
- AVES Quarterly
- EQLT Twice a year
Distribution history
AVES vs EQLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVES 14.7%EQLT 19.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVES 0.88EQLT 0.67
- Worst fall
- AVES −27.4%EQLT −40.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AVES 1.01EQLT 1.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.