SKOR ranks 4th and AVGB 17th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
AVGB vs SKOR
SKOR −0.04pt a year
0.19%0.15%
SKOR 10.9×the volume
13.8K150K
AVGB vs SKOR Performance
+1.6%+1.1%
- AVGB 0.19%
- SKOR 0.15%, better
- AVGB $68M
- SKOR $1.07B
- AVGB +1.6%, better
- SKOR +1.1%
- AVGB 3.62%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- AVGB 223
- SKOR 1344
- AVGB 13.8K sh
- SKOR 150K sh, better
- AVGB $50.46
- SKOR $47.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVGB | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A85 | A93Higher |
| Risk | A74 | A74 |
| Tradability | C54 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A77Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A76Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. AVGB and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVGBB
SKORA
In short
AVGB A 2025 arrival from Avantis: roughly 160 investment-grade credit holdings run to a one-line mandate (maximize total return), developed-market issuers included, at a fee sitting right on the category median.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
AVGB The fund seeks to maximize total return.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVGB vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVGB vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying AVGB vs SKOR
$815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVGB 0.19%
$3,952
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVGB | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $274 | $73 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $1,071 | $280 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $3,137 | $815 |
- 0.19%AVGB
- 0.15%SKOR, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
AVGB 18th cheapest of 49 funds
AVGB vs SKOR Dividends
- AVGB 3.62%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- AVGB $1.83
- SKOR $2.26
- AVGB $0.50
- SKOR $0.20
- AVGB Sep 8, 2026
- SKOR Nov 2, 2026
- AVGB Sep 10, 2026
- SKOR Nov 6, 2026
- AVGB Quarterly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
AVGB vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVGB 2.7%SKOR 4.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVGB −0.32SKOR 0.44
- Worst fall
- AVGB −2.3%SKOR −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AVGB 0.12SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.