WTV ranks 2nd and AVUV 7th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
AVUV vs WTV
WTV −0.13pt a year
0.25%0.12%
AVUV 7.7×the volume
1.29M167K
WTV +2.6pt
+10.9%+13.5%
AVUV vs WTV Performance
+67.5%+88.7%
- AVUV 0.25%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- AVUV $32.5B
- WTV $3.33B
- AVUV +28.4%, better
- WTV +21.6%
- AVUV 1.22%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- AVUV 792
- WTV 126
- AVUV 1.29M sh, better
- WTV 167K sh
- AVUV $123.42
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVUV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | D29 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A89 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | A84 |
| Durability | A91Higher | A90 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. AVUV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVUVA
WTVA
In short
AVUV The Dimensional playbook in an ETF wrapper: roughly 800 cheap U.S. small caps, weighted so the profitable ones count for more, run actively for a quarter of a percent a year.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
AVUV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in U.S. small-cap companies selected for low valuations and higher profitability. It combines broad diversification and efficient implementation with active decisions based on current market information.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVUV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVUV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying AVUV vs WTV
$2,639
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVUV 0.25%
$5,159
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVUV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $220 | $235 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $859 | $910 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $2,520 | $2,639 |
- 0.25%AVUV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
AVUV 8th cheapest of 64 funds
AVUV vs WTV Dividends
- AVUV 1.22%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- AVUV $1.52
- WTV $2.14
- AVUV $0.41
- WTV $0.55
- AVUV Sep 8, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- AVUV Sep 10, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- AVUV Quarterly
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
AVUV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AVUV
- WTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVUV 18.7%WTV 13.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AVUV 0.86WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- AVUV −28.8%WTV −19.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AVUV 1.03WTV 0.94
AVUV and WTV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



