AVXC ranks 3rd and RWEM 11th of 27 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Equity Category.
AVXC vs RWEM
AVXC −0.19pt a year
0.33%0.52%
AVXC 4.6×the volume
42.9K9.32K
AVXC vs RWEM Performance
+22.4%+15.9%
- AVXC 0.33%, better
- RWEM 0.52%
- AVXC $427M
- RWEM $73M
- AVXC +22.4%, better
- RWEM +15.9%
- AVXC 2.38%, better
- RWEM 1.91%
- AVXC 2921
- RWEM 241
- AVXC 42.9K sh, better
- RWEM 9.32K sh
- AVXC $74.83
- RWEM $33.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVXC | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A76 |
| Durability | B68Higher | C47 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
Same Category. AVXC and RWEM are both graded against the same 27 Emerging Markets Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVXCA
RWEMC
In short
AVXC The China question, answered by subtraction. Avantis runs its usual emerging-markets playbook (roughly 2,800 stocks of every size, tilted toward the cheap and the profitable) with China left out entirely, for 0.33% a year.
RWEM A Rayliant and Wilshire tie-up in active emerging-markets equity: one job, long-term capital appreciation, at a fee below what the typical active EM peer charges. Small and thinly traded, so patience at the order screen comes with it.
Stated mandate
AVXC The fund invests in a broad set of companies across emerging-market countries, excluding China, and spanning all market capitalizations. It seeks higher expected returns by overweighting securities with lower valuations and higher profitability ratios.
RWEM The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVXC vs RWEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVXC vs RWEM Cost
Overpaying RWEM vs AVXC
$3,614
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVXC 0.33%
$6,737
RWEM 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVXC | RWEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $935 | $337 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $3,593 | $1,275 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $10,351 | $3,614 |
- 0.33%AVXC, cheaper
- 0.52%RWEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
- Median 0.65%
AVXC cheapest of 27 funds
RWEM 11th cheapest of 27 funds
AVXC vs RWEM Dividends
- AVXC 2.38%, better
- RWEM 1.91%
- AVXC $1.79
- RWEM $0.64
- AVXC $0.45
- RWEM $0.64
- AVXC Sep 8, 2026
- RWEM Dec 30, 2025
- AVXC Sep 10, 2026
- RWEM Jan 7, 2026
- AVXC Quarterly
- RWEM Annual
Distribution history
AVXC vs RWEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVXC 19.2%RWEM 17.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVXC 0.76RWEM 0.96
- Worst fall
- AVXC −20.4%RWEM −26.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AVXC 0.93RWEM 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.