BALT ranks 1st and DECW 14th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs DECW
0.0%by weight
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 16.4×the volume
569K34.7K
DECW +4.9pt
+8.0%+12.9%
BALT vs DECW Performance
+5.9%+9.5%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- DECW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- DECW $148M
- BALT +5.9%
- DECW +9.5%, better
- BALT
- DECW 0.00%
- BALT 3
- DECW 2
- BALT 569K sh, better
- DECW 34.7K sh
- BALT $34.93
- DECW $36.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | DECW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B59 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and DECW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
DECWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
DECW SPY's price move for a year, with the first 20% of losses absorbed and a ceiling on the upside. DECW is the December door in AllianzIM's Buffer20 ladder: the clock starts December 1, resets each November 30, and a fresh cap is set annually.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
DECW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses. It implements this strategy mainly with FLEX Options referencing that ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs DECW Holdings
How BALT and DECW differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of DECW.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BALTMore in DECW | BALT | DECW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BALTMore in DECW | BALT | DECW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BALT101.7%
- DECW102.7%
- BALT3
- DECW2
Asset class
- BALT
- Equity
- DECW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BALT3
- In both0
- Only in DECW2
Only in BALT
3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
- Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%
Only in DECW
2 securities, 100% of DECW by weight
- Spy 11/30/2026 5.13 C102.54%
- Spy 11/30/2026 683.46 P0.15%
Weight gaps
BALT and DECW share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs DECW Cost
Overpaying DECW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
DECW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | DECW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%DECW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
DECW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs DECW Dividends
- BALT
- DECW 0.00%
- BALT None
- DECW None
Distribution history
BALT vs DECW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterDECW 6.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37, betterDECW 1.28
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%DECW −8.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18DECW 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.