Skip to content

BALT vs DECW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETF

DECWCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

BALT0.69%DECW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 16.4×the volume

BALT569KDECW34.7K

3Y return · a year

DECW +4.9pt

BALT+8.0%DECW+12.9%

BALT vs DECW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.9%BALT+9.5%DECW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +5.9%. DECW +9.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%, better
DECW 0.74%
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
DECW $148M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
DECW +9.5%, better
Yield (12M)
BALT No data
DECW 0.00%
Holdings
BALT 3
DECW 2
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
DECW 34.7K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
DECW $36.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. DECW: Cost 37, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 56, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, DECW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTDECW
Cost30% weightB65HigherD37
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC46
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB64
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB56
Durability5% weightA82HigherB59

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and DECW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and DECW 14th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49
  4. Rank 14CDECWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 15CMAYWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

DECWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

DECW SPY's price move for a year, with the first 20% of losses absorbed and a ceiling on the upside. DECW is the December door in AllianzIM's Buffer20 ladder: the clock starts December 1, resets each November 30, and a fresh cap is set annually.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

DECW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses. It implements this strategy mainly with FLEX Options referencing that ETF.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • DECW Deep end of the buffer world: the first 20 percentage points of the reference ETF's decline over the Dec 1 to Nov 30 period are absorbed, built with FLEX options rather than manager judgment.
  • At 0.74%, it charges exactly the median fee for deep-buffer funds. You're not paying a premium for the December start date.
  • One of twelve AllianzIM Buffer20 funds, one per starting month (MAYW, JUNW, AUGW and the rest), so start dates can be staggered across the calendar instead of concentrated in one.
  • No mystery about the terms: outcome period dates, the cap and the buffer are posted daily on the fund's own website, before you commit.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • DECW It targets the reference ETF's share-price return, not total return. Index dividends aren't part of the payoff, and income isn't what this structure is built to produce.
  • The same 20% buffer sells cheaper in the neighborhood: PSFJ and PSFM at 0.49%, BALT at 0.69%.
  • Thinly traded, so entry and exit costs deserve a look. The cap and buffer apply in full only from the December start to the November finish; mid-period buyers get different math.sec.gov

Full BALT profile⁠

Full DECW profile⁠

BALT vs DECW Holdings

How BALT and DECW differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of DECW.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BALT and DECW, widest gap first
SectorMore in BALTMore in DECW
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BALT and DECW, widest gap first
CountryMore in BALTMore in DECW
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BALT101.7%
  • DECW102.7%

Securities held

  • BALT3
  • DECW2

Asset class

BALT
Equity
DECW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BALT3
  • In both0
  • Only in DECW2

Only in BALT

3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%

Only in DECW

2 securities, 100% of DECW by weight

  • Spy 11/30/2026 5.13 C102.54%
  • Spy 11/30/2026 683.46 P0.15%

Weight gaps

BALT and DECW share no securities.

All 6 BALT holdings⁠All 5 DECW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs DECW Cost

Overpaying DECW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • DECW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • DECW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DECW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBALTDECWOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • 0.74%DECW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

DECW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs DECW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BALT No data
DECW 0.00%
Payout (12M)
BALT None
DECW None

Distribution history

Per share, 2024, same scale for both

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DECW1 paymentAll DECW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2024. Jan 16, 2024 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252024

BALT vs DECW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterDECW 6.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37, betterDECW 1.28
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%DECW −8.8%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18DECW 0.49

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.