BALT ranks 1st and FEBW 18th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs FEBW
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 62.5×the volume
569K9.11K
FEBW +4.0pt
+8.0%+12.0%
BALT vs FEBW Performance
+5.9%+8.8%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- FEBW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- FEBW $204M
- BALT +5.9%
- FEBW +8.8%, better
- BALT
- FEBW 0.00%
- BALT 3
- FEBW 2
- BALT 569K sh, better
- FEBW 9.11K sh
- BALT $34.93
- FEBW $36.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | FEBW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | C54 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and FEBW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
FEBWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
FEBW Deep-buffer S&P 500 exposure on a February clock: FLEX options absorb the first 20% of a year's losses, and a ceiling on the upside pays for that cushion. Priced at the category median, one rung in AllianzIM's monthly ladder.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
FEBW The Fund seeks to provide a buffer against the first 20% of losses of its underlying ETF during the applicable outcome period, using FLEX Options that reference the underlying ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs FEBW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs FEBW Cost
Overpaying FEBW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
FEBW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | FEBW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%FEBW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs FEBW Dividends
- BALT
- FEBW 0.00%
- BALT None
- FEBW None
Distribution history
BALT vs FEBW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterFEBW 5.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37FEBW 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%FEBW −8.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18FEBW 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.