BALT ranks 1st and JANW 9th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs JANW
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 11.6×the volume
569K49.1K
JANW +2.1pt
+6.2%+8.3%
BALT vs JANW Performance
+35.0%+49.0%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- JANW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- JANW $255M
- BALT +5.8%
- JANW +8.5%, better
- BALT 3
- JANW 2
- BALT 569K sh, better
- JANW 49.1K sh
- BALT $34.93
- JANW $39.61
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | JANW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B63Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B64 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and JANW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
JANWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
JANW A 20% cushion on the S&P 500 that runs on the calendar. JANW resets every January 1 and settles December 31, trading away upside above a cap set at each reset in exchange for absorbing the first 20% of the reference ETF's decline.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
JANW The Fund is designed to match the Underlying ETF’s share-price return through the outcome period up to a specified upside cap, while limiting downside losses with a 20% buffer before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs JANW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs JANW Cost
Overpaying JANW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
JANW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | JANW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%JANW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
JANW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs JANW Dividends
- BALT None
- JANW None
Distribution history
BALT vs JANW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BALT
- JANW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterJANW 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37JANW 1.40, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%, betterJANW −9.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18JANW 0.35
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.