BALT ranks 1st and JULH 22nd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs JULH
BALT −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
BALT 142.4×the volume
569K4K
BALT +0.6pt
+8.0%+7.4%
BALT vs JULH Performance
+5.9%+5.9%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- JULH 0.79%
- BALT $3.47B
- JULH $17M
- BALT +5.9%
- JULH +5.9%
- BALT
- JULH 6.44%
- BALT 3
- JULH 5
- BALT 569K sh, better
- JULH 4K sh
- BALT $34.93
- JULH $24.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | JULH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65 | B65 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | C40 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and JULH are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
JULHD
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
JULH Defined outcome investing tilted toward income: JULH seeks a high level of income through defined distributions while applying a 20% barrier to S&P 500 price index losses over each July-to-June outcome period.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
JULH The Fund seeks to provide a high level of income through defined distributions while applying a 20% barrier to losses in the S&P 500 Price Return Index over each approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs JULH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs JULH Cost
Overpaying JULH vs BALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
JULH 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | JULH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.79%JULH
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
JULH 22nd cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs JULH Dividends
- BALT
- JULH 6.44%
- BALT None
- JULH $1.61
- BALT
- JULH $0.41
- BALT
- JULH Sep 30, 2026
- BALT
- JULH Oct 2, 2026
- BALT
- JULH Quarterly
Distribution history
BALT vs JULH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%JULH 1.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37JULH 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%JULH −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18JULH 0.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.