Skip to content

BALT vs JULW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF

JULWCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

BALT0.69%JULW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 24.1×the volume

BALT569KJULW23.6K

5Y return · a year

JULW +2.7pt

BALT+6.2%JULW+8.9%

BALT vs JULW Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+35.0%BALT+53.0%JULW

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. BALT +35.0%. JULW +53.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%, better
JULW 0.74%
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
JULW $254M
1Y total return
BALT +5.8%
JULW +7.0%, better
Yield (12M)
BALT No data
JULW 0.00%
Holdings
BALT 3
JULW 2
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
JULW 23.6K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
JULW $41.45
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 63, Mission 78, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. JULW: Cost 37, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 63, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, JULW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTJULW
Cost30% weightB65HigherD37
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB63HigherC49
Tradability15% weightB64B67Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB63
Durability5% weightA82HigherA77

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and JULW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

JULWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • JULW Sits at the deep end of the buffer scale. The fund aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses across a 12-month outcome period.allianzim.com
  • One slot in a 12-month ladder, so the July start date is a choice, not an inheritance. JULW has run that slot since its 2020 launch.allianzim.com
  • The 0.74% fee lands right at the median for 20% buffer funds on the S&P 500, not a premium for the insurer's name on the door.
  • Among the sturdier builds in its deep-buffer peer group, with no structural quirks flagged in our review.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • JULW Buffer and cap are measured start to finish of each July outcome period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room is left, not the headline 20%.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 price index, so index dividends sit outside the math, and the fund is not built to pay income.
  • Cheaper ways to buy a 20% buffer exist: PBFR at 0.50% and PSFJ at 0.49%, against 0.74% here.

Full BALT profile⁠

Full JULW profile⁠

BALT vs JULW Holdings

How BALT and JULW differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of JULW.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BALT and JULW, widest gap first
SectorMore in BALTMore in JULW
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BALT and JULW, widest gap first
CountryMore in BALTMore in JULW
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BALT101.7%
  • JULW102.8%

Securities held

  • BALT3
  • JULW2

Asset class

BALT
Equity
JULW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BALT3
  • In both0
  • Only in JULW2

Only in BALT

3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%

Only in JULW

2 securities, 100% of JULW by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 5.60 C98.71%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.10%

Weight gaps

BALT and JULW share no securities.

All 6 BALT holdings⁠All 5 JULW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs JULW Cost

Overpaying JULW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • JULW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • JULW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JULW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBALTJULWOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • 0.74%JULW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs JULW Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BALT No data
JULW 0.00%
Payout (12M)
BALT None
JULW None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULW1 paymentAll JULW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $0.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502020

BALT vs JULW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BALT
  • JULW
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: JULW −9.5% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterJULW 5.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37JULW 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%, betterJULW −9.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18JULW 0.38

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.