BALT ranks 1st and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs JULW
0.0%by weight
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 24.1×the volume
569K23.6K
JULW +2.7pt
+6.2%+8.9%
BALT vs JULW Performance
+35.0%+53.0%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- JULW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- JULW $254M
- BALT +5.8%
- JULW +7.0%, better
- BALT
- JULW 0.00%
- BALT 3
- JULW 2
- BALT 569K sh, better
- JULW 23.6K sh
- BALT $34.93
- JULW $41.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | JULW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B63Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B64 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | A77 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and JULW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
JULWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs JULW Holdings
How BALT and JULW differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of JULW.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BALTMore in JULW | BALT | JULW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BALTMore in JULW | BALT | JULW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BALT101.7%
- JULW102.8%
- BALT3
- JULW2
Asset class
- BALT
- Equity
- JULW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BALT3
- In both0
- Only in JULW2
Only in BALT
3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
- Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%
Only in JULW
2 securities, 100% of JULW by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 5.60 C98.71%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.10%
Weight gaps
BALT and JULW share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs JULW Cost
Overpaying JULW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
JULW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | JULW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%JULW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs JULW Dividends
- BALT
- JULW 0.00%
- BALT None
- JULW None
Distribution history
BALT vs JULW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BALT
- JULW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterJULW 5.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37JULW 1.41, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%, betterJULW −9.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18JULW 0.38
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.