Skip to content

BALT vs JUNW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF

JUNWCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

BALT0.69%JUNW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 18.4×the volume

BALT569KJUNW30.9K

3Y return · a year

JUNW +2.8pt

BALT+7.7%JUNW+10.5%

BALT vs JUNW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.8%BALT+5.3%JUNW

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BALT +5.8%. JUNW +5.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%, better
JUNW 0.74%
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
JUNW $378M
1Y total return
BALT +5.8%, better
JUNW +5.3%
Holdings
BALT 3
JUNW 2
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
JUNW 30.9K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
JUNW $34.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 63, Mission 78, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. JUNW: Cost 37, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 71, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, JUNW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTJUNW
Cost30% weightB65HigherD37
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB63HigherC48
Tradability15% weightB64HigherB59
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA71
Durability5% weightA82HigherB58

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and JUNW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and JUNW 13th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 14CDECWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

JUNWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

JUNW JUNW is the June rung in AllianzIM's ladder of deep-buffer funds: it aims to match the one-year share-price return of the S&P 500's biggest ETF, absorbing the first 20% of losses in exchange for a capped upside.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

JUNW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust's share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and protection against the first 20% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • JUNW Deep by design: the structure is built to absorb the first 20% of a one-year decline in the reference ETF, with an upside cap set at the start of each period as the trade-off.
  • Fixed calendar: the June series runs June 1 through May 31, so the terms are published up front and reset on the same schedule every year.
  • One rung of a full ladder: AllianzIM runs the same 20% buffer with other start months (JANW, APRW, MAYW, AUGW, DECW), so this is a repeatable sleeve rather than a one-off.
  • The reference point is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, a price you can watch trade, not a bespoke index calculated somewhere out of view.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • JUNW 0.74% a year is mid-pack for deep-buffer funds; cheaper builds of the same idea exist, including PBFR at 0.50% and Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds at 0.49%.
  • The payoff tracks share-price return only, so dividends from the underlying sit outside the deal, and gains stop at the cap.
  • Come in mid-period and you inherit a different cap and less remaining cushion; the math is engineered to land at the outcome period's end.

Full BALT profile⁠

Full JUNW profile⁠

BALT vs JUNW Holdings

How BALT and JUNW differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of JUNW.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BALT and JUNW, widest gap first
SectorMore in BALTMore in JUNW
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BALT and JUNW, widest gap first
CountryMore in BALTMore in JUNW
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BALT101.7%
  • JUNW102.0%

Securities held

  • BALT3
  • JUNW2

Asset class

BALT
Equity
JUNW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BALT3
  • In both0
  • Only in JUNW2

Only in BALT

3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%

Only in JUNW

2 securities, 100% of JUNW by weight

  • Spy 05/28/2027 5.67 C97.97%
  • Spy 05/28/2027 756.56 P4.08%

Weight gaps

BALT and JUNW share no securities.

All 6 BALT holdings⁠All 5 JUNW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs JUNW Cost

Overpaying JUNW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • JUNW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • JUNW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JUNW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBALTJUNWOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • 0.74%JUNW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

JUNW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs JUNW Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
JUNW None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNWAll JUNW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs JUNW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterJUNW 4.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37, betterJUNW 1.29
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%JUNW −8.5%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18JUNW 0.33

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.