BALT ranks 1st and JUNW 13th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs JUNW
0.0%by weight
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 18.4×the volume
569K30.9K
JUNW +2.8pt
+7.7%+10.5%
BALT vs JUNW Performance
+5.8%+5.3%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- JUNW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- JUNW $378M
- BALT +5.8%, better
- JUNW +5.3%
- BALT 3
- JUNW 2
- BALT 569K sh, better
- JUNW 30.9K sh
- BALT $34.93
- JUNW $34.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | JUNW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B63Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A71 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B58 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and JUNW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
JUNWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
JUNW JUNW is the June rung in AllianzIM's ladder of deep-buffer funds: it aims to match the one-year share-price return of the S&P 500's biggest ETF, absorbing the first 20% of losses in exchange for a capped upside.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
JUNW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust's share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and protection against the first 20% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs JUNW Holdings
How BALT and JUNW differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of JUNW.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BALTMore in JUNW | BALT | JUNW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BALTMore in JUNW | BALT | JUNW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BALT101.7%
- JUNW102.0%
- BALT3
- JUNW2
Asset class
- BALT
- Equity
- JUNW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BALT3
- In both0
- Only in JUNW2
Only in BALT
3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
- Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%
Only in JUNW
2 securities, 100% of JUNW by weight
- Spy 05/28/2027 5.67 C97.97%
- Spy 05/28/2027 756.56 P4.08%
Weight gaps
BALT and JUNW share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs JUNW Cost
Overpaying JUNW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
JUNW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | JUNW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%JUNW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
JUNW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs JUNW Dividends
- BALT None
- JUNW None
Distribution history
BALT vs JUNW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterJUNW 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37, betterJUNW 1.29
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%JUNW −8.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18JUNW 0.33
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.