Skip to content

BALT vs MAYW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF

MAYWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

BALT0.69%MAYW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 20.0×the volume

BALT569KMAYW28.5K

3Y return · a year

MAYW +3.6pt

BALT+8.0%MAYW+11.6%

BALT vs MAYW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.9%BALT+7.1%MAYW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +5.9%. MAYW +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%, better
MAYW 0.74%
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
MAYW $460M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
MAYW +7.1%, better
Holdings
BALT 3
MAYW 2
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
MAYW 28.5K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
MAYW $35.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. MAYW: Cost 37, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 59, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, MAYW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTMAYW
Cost30% weightB65HigherD37
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherB57
Tradability15% weightB66HigherC49
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB59
Durability5% weightA82HigherB60

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and MAYW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and MAYW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 14CDECWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETFScore 48
  4. Rank 15CMAYWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

MAYWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

MAYW A 20% cushion on the S&P 500, reset every May. MAYW holds a year of FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust: the first 20% of a drop gets absorbed, and upside stops at a cap set fresh each period.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

MAYW The Fund uses FLEX Options tied to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust to seek the ETF’s share-price return through the current Outcome Period, subject to an upside cap and a 20% downside buffer.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • MAYW Deep cushion by design: the options package aims to absorb the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price decline over the outcome period.
  • Terms are known upfront. Each May 1 the fund starts a new 12-month period with a new cap, so the trade-off is spelled out before the clock runs.
  • One of the stronger builds in the 20% S&P 500 buffer group, with enough size and turnover to trade without drama.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • MAYW The cap is what pays for the buffer. Gains above it stay on the table, and the fund targets share-price return, so S&P dividends aren't part of the package.
  • Buffer and cap are measured May 1 to April 30. Step in mid-period and your actual cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • At 0.74% it sits right at the group median, but cheaper 20% buffer builds exist (PBFR at 0.50%, PSFM at 0.49%).

Full BALT profile⁠

Full MAYW profile⁠

BALT vs MAYW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs MAYW Cost

Overpaying MAYW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • MAYW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • MAYW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MAYW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBALTMAYWOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • 0.74%MAYW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

MAYW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs MAYW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
MAYW None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MAYWAll MAYW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs MAYW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterMAYW 3.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37MAYW 1.99, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%MAYW −7.9%since May 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18MAYW 0.25

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAYWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAYWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAYWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.