Skip to content

BALT vs NVBW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF

NVBWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

BALT0.69%NVBW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 106.4×the volume

BALT569KNVBW5.35K

3Y return · a year

NVBW +3.1pt

BALT+8.0%NVBW+11.1%

BALT vs NVBW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.9%BALT+10.0%NVBW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +5.9%. NVBW +10.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%, better
NVBW 0.74%
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
NVBW $97M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
NVBW +10.0%, better
Holdings
BALT 3
NVBW 2
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
NVBW 5.35K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
NVBW $37.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. NVBW: Cost 37, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 58, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, NVBW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTNVBW
Cost30% weightB65HigherD37
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC47
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB59
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB58
Durability5% weightA82HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and NVBW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and NVBW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 15CMAYWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETFScore 47
  4. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

NVBWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

NVBW An insurance hedging desk in ETF form: NVBW absorbs the first 20% of a year's losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset each November.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

NVBW The Fund seeks to track the share-price returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over its one-year Outcome Period up to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses in the Underlying ETF.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • NVBW The 20% buffer is at the deep end of the buffer shelf, and it resets on a fresh one-year clock every November.allianzim.com
  • AllianzIM runs the options itself, on the same in-house hedging platform Allianz Life uses for its annuity book, instead of outsourcing the trade.allianzlife.com
  • At 0.74%, the fee sits right at the middle of its deep-buffer peer group. No premium for the Allianz name.
  • Live since 2022, with multiple full outcome periods completed.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • NVBW Buffer and cap apply in full only if you hold from the start of the November outcome period to its end. Buy mid-period and your terms differ.allianzlife.com
  • Cheaper deep-buffer alternatives exist: PSFJ and PSFM both charge 0.49%.
  • You track SPY's share-price returns, so dividends aren't part of the deal, and the fund trades lightly enough that limit orders matter.

Full BALT profile⁠

Full NVBW profile⁠

BALT vs NVBW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs NVBW Cost

Overpaying NVBW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • NVBW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • NVBW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NVBW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBALTNVBWOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • 0.74%NVBW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

NVBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs NVBW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
NVBW None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NVBWAll NVBW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs NVBW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterNVBW 4.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37, betterNVBW 1.35
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%NVBW −8.4%since Nov 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18NVBW 0.40

BALT and NVBW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.