BALT ranks 1st and NVBW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs NVBW
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 106.4×the volume
569K5.35K
NVBW +3.1pt
+8.0%+11.1%
BALT vs NVBW Performance
+5.9%+10.0%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- NVBW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- NVBW $97M
- BALT +5.9%
- NVBW +10.0%, better
- BALT 3
- NVBW 2
- BALT 569K sh, better
- NVBW 5.35K sh
- BALT $34.93
- NVBW $37.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | NVBW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | B58 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and NVBW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
NVBWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
NVBW An insurance hedging desk in ETF form: NVBW absorbs the first 20% of a year's losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset each November.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
NVBW The Fund seeks to track the share-price returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over its one-year Outcome Period up to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses in the Underlying ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs NVBW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs NVBW Cost
Overpaying NVBW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
NVBW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | NVBW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%NVBW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
NVBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs NVBW Dividends
- BALT None
- NVBW None
Distribution history
BALT vs NVBW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterNVBW 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37, betterNVBW 1.35
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%NVBW −8.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18NVBW 0.40
BALT and NVBW in the news
Filings Digest
TACK holders vote Dec. 10 on the move to Amplify

Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.