BALT ranks 1st and PSFD 2nd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs PSFD
PSFD −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.49%
BALT 628.6×the volume
569K905
PSFD +5.1pt
+6.2%+11.3%
BALT vs PSFD Performance
+35.2%+70.8%
- BALT 0.69%
- PSFD 0.49%, better
- BALT $3.47B
- PSFD $60M
- BALT +5.9%
- PSFD +11.4%, better
- BALT 3
- PSFD 4
- BALT 569K sh, better
- PSFD 905 sh
- BALT $34.93
- PSFD $40.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | PSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
PSFDB
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs PSFD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs PSFD Cost
Overpaying BALT vs PSFD
$3,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
PSFD 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | PSFD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $883 | $349 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,394 | $1,303 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,792 | $3,637 |
- 0.69%BALT
- 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFD cheapest of 24 funds
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs PSFD Dividends
- BALT None
- PSFD None
Distribution history
BALT vs PSFD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BALT
- PSFD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterPSFD 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37PSFD 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%, betterPSFD −14.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18PSFD 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.