Skip to content

BALT vs PSFD

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFD −0.20pt a year

BALT0.69%PSFD0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 628.6×the volume

BALT569KPSFD905

5Y return · a year

PSFD +5.1pt

BALT+6.2%PSFD+11.3%

BALT vs PSFD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.2%BALT+70.8%PSFD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +35.2%. PSFD +70.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%
PSFD 0.49%, better
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
PSFD $60M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
PSFD +11.4%, better
Holdings
BALT 3
PSFD 4
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
PSFD 905 sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
PSFD $40.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, PSFD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTPSFD
Cost30% weightB65A85Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherD30
Tradability15% weightB66HigherC45
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA82HigherB69

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and PSFD 2nd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com

Full BALT profile⁠

Full PSFD profile⁠

BALT vs PSFD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs PSFD Cost

Overpaying BALT vs PSFD

$3,637

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • PSFD 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BALT $13,429PSFD $9,792

Year by year

YearBALTPSFDOverpaying
10$1,232$883$349
20$4,697$3,394$1,303
30$13,429$9,792$3,637

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT
  • 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs PSFD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
PSFD None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs PSFD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BALT
  • PSFD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSFD −14.9% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterPSFD 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37PSFD 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%, betterPSFD −14.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18PSFD 0.56

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFMB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFMB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.