Skip to content

BALT vs PSFO

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.20pt a year

BALT0.69%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 79.9×the volume

BALT569KPSFO7.12K

5Y return · a year

PSFO +4.7pt

BALT+6.2%PSFO+10.9%

BALT vs PSFO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.2%BALT+68.1%PSFO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +35.2%. PSFO +68.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2021May 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Holdings
BALT 3
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
PSFO 7.12K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTPSFO
Cost30% weightB65A85Higher
Mission25% weightA78A95Higher
Risk15% weightB65HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB66HigherC44
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA82HigherB59

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and PSFO 4th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full BALT profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

BALT vs PSFO Holdings

As of

How BALT and PSFO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BALT and 0.0% of PSFO.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in BALT and PSFO, widest gap first
SectorMore in BALTMore in PSFO
Consumer DiscretionaryPSFO +1.2 points
TechnologyBALT +1.0 points
Health CareBALT +1.1 points
CommunicationPSFO +0.7 points
EnergyBALT +0.3 points
FinancialsBALT +0.2 points
UtilitiesPSFO +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSFO +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesPSFO +0.1 points
Real EstatePSFO +0.1 points
MaterialsPSFO +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BALT and PSFO, widest gap first
CountryMore in BALTMore in PSFO
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BALT101.7%
  • PSFO104.6%

Securities held

  • BALT3
  • PSFO3

Asset class

BALT
Equity
PSFO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BALT3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFO3

Only in BALT

3 securities, 100% of BALT by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 1.91 C98.56%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 762.63 P2.67%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.44%

Only in PSFO

3 securities, 100% of PSFO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.54 C98.93%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.63 P4.57%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 457.58 P0.44%

Weight gaps

BALT and PSFO share no securities.

All 6 BALT holdings⁠All 7 PSFO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying BALT vs PSFO

$3,637

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BALT $13,429PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearBALTPSFOOverpaying
10$1,232$883$349
20$4,697$3,394$1,303
30$13,429$9,792$3,637

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
PSFO None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BALT
  • PSFO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSFO −12.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−4%−2%0%Oct 2021May 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37PSFO 1.38, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%, betterPSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFMB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFMB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.