BALT ranks 1st and SEPW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
BALT vs SEPW
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
BALT 12.1×the volume
569K47K
SEPW +3.8pt
+8.0%+11.8%
BALT vs SEPW Performance
+5.9%+7.2%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- SEPW 0.74%
- BALT $3.47B
- SEPW $213M
- BALT +5.9%
- SEPW +7.2%, better
- BALT 3
- SEPW 3
- BALT 569K sh, better
- SEPW 47K sh
- BALT $34.93
- SEPW $34.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BALT | SEPW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | B66 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B55 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. BALT and SEPW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BALTB
SEPWC
In short
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
SEPW September's door into AllianzIM's deep-buffer series: SEPW absorbs the first 20% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share price, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September 1.
Stated mandate
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
SEPW The fund seeks to track the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through the current outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while protecting the first 20% of underlying losses. Fees reduce the stated cap and buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BALT vs SEPW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BALT vs SEPW Cost
Overpaying SEPW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
SEPW 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BALT | SEPW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- 0.74%SEPW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
SEPW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
BALT vs SEPW Dividends
- BALT None
- SEPW None
Distribution history
BALT vs SEPW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BALT 2.4%, betterSEPW 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BALT 1.37SEPW 1.41, better
- Worst fall
- BALT −4.9%SEPW −8.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BALT 0.18SEPW 0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.