Skip to content

BALT vs SEPW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF

SEPWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

BALT0.69%SEPW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 12.1×the volume

BALT569KSEPW47K

3Y return · a year

SEPW +3.8pt

BALT+8.0%SEPW+11.8%

BALT vs SEPW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.9%BALT+7.2%SEPW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BALT +5.9%. SEPW +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BALT 0.69%, better
SEPW 0.74%
Fund size
BALT $3.47B
SEPW $213M
1Y total return
BALT +5.9%
SEPW +7.2%, better
Holdings
BALT 3
SEPW 3
Avg volume (30D)
BALT 569K sh, better
SEPW 47K sh
NAV per share
BALT $34.93
SEPW $34.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BALT: Cost 65, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. SEPW: Cost 37, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 83, Holdings 69, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for BALT, SEPW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBALTSEPW
Cost30% weightB65HigherD37
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC41
Tradability15% weightB66A83Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB69
Durability5% weightA82HigherB55

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BALT and SEPW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and SEPW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

SEPWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF

In short

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

SEPW September's door into AllianzIM's deep-buffer series: SEPW absorbs the first 20% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share price, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September 1.

Stated mandate

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

SEPW The fund seeks to track the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through the current outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while protecting the first 20% of underlying losses. Fees reduce the stated cap and buffer.

Why people hold it

  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • SEPW Deep end of the buffer world: the first 20% of the reference ETF's price decline over a full outcome period is absorbed. Fees reduce the stated buffer and cap.
  • A 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued note, so no single issuer's balance sheet sits between the strategy and the payoff.
  • One month in a series: March and May siblings run the same 20% buffer on the same reference, so the start date isn't dictated by a single point on the calendar.

Worth knowing

  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.
  • SEPW Cost sits at the top of the deep-buffer group: 0.74%, against 0.50% at PGIM's laddered PBFR and 0.49% at the Pacer Swan flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM).
  • The reference is a share price, so S&P 500 dividends don't count toward the capped return, and income isn't part of the design.
  • Bought mid-period, the effective buffer and cap differ from the headline terms, which apply across a complete outcome period.

Full BALT profile⁠

Full SEPW profile⁠

BALT vs SEPW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BALT vs SEPW Cost

Overpaying SEPW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • SEPW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BALT 0.69%
  • SEPW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SEPW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBALTSEPWOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • 0.74%SEPW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

SEPW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

BALT vs SEPW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BALT None
SEPW None

Distribution history

BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SEPWAll SEPW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BALT vs SEPW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BALT 2.4%, betterSEPW 4.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BALT 1.37SEPW 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BALT −4.9%SEPW −8.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BALT 0.18SEPW 0.39

Popular comparisons

  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.