Skip to content

BAUG vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BAUGCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BAUG0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 6.2×the volume

BAUG22.4KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

BAUG +8.5pt

BAUG+19.1%ZALT+10.6%

BAUG vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.8%BAUG+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BAUG +10.8%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BAUG 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BAUG $267M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
BAUG +10.8%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
BAUG 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BAUG 22.4K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
BAUG $55.05
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAUG: Cost 40, Risk 54, Mission 100, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAUG, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBAUGZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA80
Risk15% weightC54A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB63B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightA79HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAUG and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BAUG 37th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 34CNVBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 37CBAUGInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 37CBJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAUGCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BAUG A year of S&P 500 exposure with the first 9% of losses absorbed, in exchange for an upside cap set fresh every August 1. This is the August-reset seat in Innovator's buffer lineup, built to be held the full twelve months.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BAUG The Fund seeks returns linked to its underlying ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 9% of underlying losses during the applicable outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BAUG Mechanically simple: the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's losses over the outcome period are absorbed, and upside runs to a cap reset each August 1.innovatoretfs.com
  • No style drift. It delivers the defined-outcome structure on its stated reference fund and nothing else, which is exactly what the prospectus advertises.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for annual buffer funds. You are not paying a premium for the August calendar slot.
  • Live since 2019, so it has run through multiple complete 12-month outcome cycles rather than being an untested launch.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BAUG Thinly traded next to its peers, so spreads can widen. Order type and timing matter more here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • Buy mid-period and your own buffer and cap differ from the stated terms, which run August 1 to July 31 and are measured before the fund's fee.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper wrappers around the same idea exist: BUFB ladders buffers for 0.10%, and ZALT runs a quarterly reset at 0.69%.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BAUG profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BAUG vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAUG vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BAUG vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAUG 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAUG 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAUG $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBAUGZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BAUG
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BAUG 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BAUG vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BAUG None
ZALT None

Distribution history

BAUGAll BAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BAUG vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAUG 8.4%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAUG 1.61, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAUG −15.6%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAUG 0.69ZALT 0.29

BAUG and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BAUGCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAUGCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAUGCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.