SCHO ranks 1st and BBSB 4th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
BBSB vs SCHO
SCHO −0.01pt a year
0.04%0.03%
SCHO 2286.3×the volume
1.99K4.55M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+4.2%+4.2%
BBSB vs SCHO Performance
+2.2%+2.1%
- BBSB 0.04%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- BBSB $55M
- SCHO $15.7B
- BBSB +2.2%, better
- SCHO +2.1%
- BBSB 4.12%
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- BBSB 92
- SCHO 97
- BBSB 1.99K sh
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- BBSB $97.77
- SCHO $24.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBSB | SCHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A89 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | B69Higher |
| Durability | D35 | A77Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. BBSB and SCHO are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBSBA
SCHOA
In short
BBSB A plain box of short Treasuries at 0.04%, well under what the category's longtime benchmark fund charges for the very same ICE index. About 90 bonds, monthly income, no story beyond the math.
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
Stated mandate
BBSB The fund seeks current income by tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. It uses representative sampling to closely replicate the index's characteristics.
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBSB vs SCHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBSB vs SCHO Cost
Overpaying BBSB vs SCHO
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBSB 0.04%
$849
SCHO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBSB | SCHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $55 | $18 |
| 20 | $288 | $216 | $72 |
| 30 | $849 | $638 | $211 |
- 0.04%BBSB
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
BBSB 4th cheapest of 15 funds
BBSB vs SCHO Dividends
- BBSB 4.12%
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- BBSB $4.02
- SCHO $1.00
- BBSB $0.33
- SCHO $0.08
- BBSB Nov 2, 2026
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- BBSB Pays Nov 4, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- BBSB Monthly
- SCHO Monthly
Distribution history
BBSB vs SCHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBSB 1.6%, betterSCHO 1.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBSB −0.19SCHO −0.17, better
- Worst fall
- BBSB −1.6%SCHO −5.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BBSB 0.23SCHO 0.23Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.