ZALT ranks 1st and BDEC 47th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BDEC vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 20.7×the volume
6.53K135K
BDEC +5.2pt
+15.2%+10.0%
BDEC vs ZALT Performance
+11.8%+7.7%
- BDEC 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- BDEC $206M
- ZALT $835M
- BDEC +11.8%, better
- ZALT +7.7%
- BDEC 3
- ZALT 503
- BDEC 6.53K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- BDEC $52.91
- ZALT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDEC | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | D37 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A89 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BDEC and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDECC
ZALTA
In short
BDEC Innovator invented the buffer ETF, and BDEC is the December door into that lineup: SPY's price moves with the first 9% of losses absorbed, the upside capped, and the whole deal reset every December 1.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
BDEC The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate its underlying ETF over an approximately one-year period, subject to a capped upside and protection against the first 9% of losses.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDEC vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDEC vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying BDEC vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDEC 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDEC | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%BDEC
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
BDEC 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BDEC vs ZALT Dividends
- BDEC None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
BDEC vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDEC 8.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BDEC 1.33ZALT 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- BDEC −16.4%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BDEC 0.72ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.