DFAC ranks 3rd and BDIV 42nd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
BDIV vs DFAC
DFAC −0.32pt a year
0.49%0.17%
DFAC 650.9×the volume
3.08K2M
BDIV vs DFAC Performance
+12.3%+16.1%
- BDIV 0.49%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- BDIV $7M
- DFAC $87.7B
- BDIV +12.3%
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- BDIV 1.03%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- BDIV 35
- DFAC 2553
- BDIV 3.08K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- BDIV $25.14
- DFAC $44.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDIV | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A83Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | C41 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | A87Higher |
| Durability | D28 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. BDIV and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDIVB
DFACA
In short
BDIV A boutique that does one thing, dividend growth, picks a few dozen US stocks and pays out monthly. Priced below the typical active US equity fund, it's a concentrated take on income plus appreciation rather than a broad dividend index.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
BDIV The Fund seeks current dividend income and long-term capital appreciation.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDIV vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDIV vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying BDIV vs DFAC
$6,246
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDIV 0.49%
$9,792
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDIV | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $310 | $573 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,211 | $2,183 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $3,546 | $6,246 |
- 0.49%BDIV
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
BDIV 39th cheapest of 121 funds
BDIV vs DFAC Dividends
- BDIV 1.03%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- BDIV $0.26
- DFAC $0.39
- BDIV $0.02
- DFAC $0.10
- BDIV Oct 30, 2026
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- BDIV Pays Nov 3, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- BDIV Monthly
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
BDIV vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDIV 11.2%DFAC 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BDIV 0.85DFAC 1.32
- Worst fall
- BDIV −15.0%DFAC −23.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BDIV 0.75DFAC 0.99
BDIV and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.