Skip to content

BDVL vs HXE

iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

BDVLANasdaq

Mast HedgeIndex Adaptive Equities ETF

HXE—NYSE Arca

Overlap

15.1%by weight

Expense ratio

BDVL −0.60pt a year

BDVL0.39%HXE0.99%

Avg volume · 30D

BDVL 52.0×the volume

BDVL236KHXE4.55K

BDVL vs HXE Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.4%BDVL−0.2%HXE

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BDVL +1.4%. HXE −0.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
BDVL 0.39%, better
HXE 0.99%
Fund size
BDVL $1.77B
HXE $33M
1Y total return
BDVL +9.6%
HXE No data
Holdings
BDVL 423
HXE 77
Avg volume (30D)
BDVL 236K sh, better
HXE 4.55K sh
NAV per share
BDVL $26.44
HXE $25.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —HXENot yet graded
BDVL: Cost 79, Risk 80, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 88, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for BDVL, HXE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBDVLHXE
Cost30% weightA79Not scored
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA80Not scored
Tradability15% weightB68Not scored
Holdings10% weightA88Not scored
Durability5% weightA93Not scored

Rank among Global Active Equity funds

Global Active Equity⁠

Category · 44 funds
See all 44 ›

BDVL ranks 1st of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVTMAvantis Total Equity Markets ETF 1Score 79
  2. Rank 1ABDVLiShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 1ADFAWDimensional World Equity ETFScore 79
  4. HXENot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BDVLAiShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

HXE—Mast HedgeIndex Adaptive Equities ETF

In short

BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.

HXE No data

Stated mandate

BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.

HXE No data

Why people hold it

  • BDVL Costs 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028, below the median fee among global active equity peers and under sibling fund BFLX at 0.40%.
  • Roughly 500 holdings worldwide, so no single stock runs the show. Its holdings build and risk profile rank among the strongest in its peer group.
  • Built to hold core equity exposure while leaning toward stocks that have shown smaller price swings than the broad market.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2017, a long life for an active equity ETF, and it has gathered billions from investors along the way.

HXE No data

Worth knowing

  • BDVL A model, not an index, picks the names. Active discretion cuts both ways against the MSCI minimum-volatility benchmark it is measured by.
  • The low-vol tilt means lighter exposure to the market's most volatile high-flyers, which shapes how it behaves when those names run.
  • Cheaper active options sit in the same category: AVTM at 0.22% and AVGE at 0.23% deliver broad global equity without the volatility focus.

HXE No data

Full BDVL profile⁠

Full HXE profile⁠

BDVL vs HXE Holdings

How BDVL and HXE differ

Overlap by weight

15.1%

Shared holdings make up 60.3% of HXE and 15.6% of BDVL.

Level by level

  • Holdings32 in both15.1%
  • Countryby domicile69.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for HXE.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BDVL and HXE, widest gap first
CountryMore in BDVLMore in HXE
United StatesHXE +30.2 points
JapanBDVL +8.1 points
ChinaBDVL +5.4 points
TaiwanBDVL +3.5 points
IndiaBDVL +2.8 points
GermanyBDVL +2.8 points
NetherlandsBDVL +2.6 points
SwitzerlandBDVL +2.1 points
Other countries (4)BDVL +2.9 points

Outside the US: BDVL 62% developed, 38% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BDVL17.0%
  • HXE52.9%

Securities held

  • BDVL401
  • HXE77

Asset class

BDVL
Equity
HXE
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BDVL369
  • In both32
  • Only in HXE45

Only in BDVL

369 securities, 100% of BDVL by weight

  • Asml Holding1.95%
  • Microsoft1.73%
  • Amazon.com Inc1.33%

Only in HXE

45 securities, 100% of HXE by weight

  • Medtronic PLC5.23%
  • Us T Bill Zcp 12/24/265.13%
  • Us T Bill Zcp 01/21/275.10%

Weight gaps

All 32 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BDVL and HXE, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BDVLMore in HXE
Colgate-PalmoliveCLHXE +7.03 points
Broadridge Financial Solutions IncBRHXE +3.51 points
Broadcom IncAVGOHXE +3.31 points
AbbVieABBVHXE +3.14 points
News Class ANWSAHXE +3.11 points
Meta Platforms Class AMETAHXE +2.80 points
Micron TechnologyMUHXE +2.68 points
Alphabet Class CGOOGHXE +2.54 points

All 514 BDVL holdings⁠All 83 HXE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BDVL vs HXE Cost

Overpaying HXE vs BDVL

$10,627

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BDVL 0.39%

    $7,898

  • HXE 0.99%

    $18,525

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BDVL 0.39%
  • HXE 0.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HXE $18,525BDVL $7,898

Year by year

YearBDVLHXEOverpaying
10$705$1,746$1,041
20$2,725$6,565$3,840
30$7,898$18,525$10,627

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
  • 0.99%HXE
  • Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.69%

BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds

HXE 38th cheapest of 44 funds

BDVL vs HXE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BDVL No data
HXE None
Last payment
BDVL $0.22
HXE No data
Ex-dividend
BDVL Jun 15, 2026
HXE No data
Paid on
BDVL Jun 18, 2026
HXE No data
Frequency
BDVL Twice a year
HXE No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

BDVLTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll BDVL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2025 $0.69; Jun 15, 2026 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
HXEAll HXE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BDVL vs HXE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BDVL 8.7%since Oct 2025HXE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BDVL 0.60since Oct 2025HXE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BDVL −7.7%since Sep 2025HXE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BDVL 0.61HXE 0.00

BDVL and HXE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BDVLAvsAVTMA

    iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF · Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF 1

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HXE—vsAVTMA

    Mast HedgeIndex Adaptive Equities ETF · Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF 1

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDVLAvsDFAWA

    iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF · Dimensional World Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HXE—vsDFAWA

    Mast HedgeIndex Adaptive Equities ETF · Dimensional World Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDVLAvsAVGEA

    iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HXE—vsAVGEA

    Mast HedgeIndex Adaptive Equities ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.