BDVL ranks 1st and JGLO 12th of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
BDVL vs JGLO
BDVL −0.08pt a year
0.39%0.47%
BDVL 1.1×the volume
236K216K
BDVL vs JGLO Performance
+9.7%+5.0%
- BDVL 0.39%, better
- JGLO 0.47%
- BDVL $1.77B
- JGLO $6.19B
- BDVL +9.7%, better
- JGLO +5.0%
- BDVL
- JGLO 1.15%
- BDVL 423
- JGLO 89
- BDVL 236K sh, better
- JGLO 216K sh
- BDVL $26.44
- JGLO $70.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDVL | JGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | A72 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A88 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. BDVL and JGLO are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDVLA
JGLOB
In short
BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.
JGLO An active global stock picker from J.P. Morgan: roughly 80 developed-market large caps, measured against the MSCI World, at a price well under the typical active global fund.
Stated mandate
BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.
JGLO The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a global equity portfolio, primarily investing in large-cap stocks across global developed markets. Its active fundamental process emphasizes attractive valuation, strong free cash flow and sustained earnings growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDVL vs JGLO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDVL vs JGLO Cost
Overpaying JGLO vs BDVL
$1,520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDVL 0.39%
$7,898
JGLO 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDVL | JGLO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $847 | $142 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,261 | $536 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,418 | $1,520 |
- 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
- 0.47%JGLO
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds
JGLO 13th cheapest of 44 funds
BDVL vs JGLO Dividends
- BDVL
- JGLO 1.15%
- BDVL
- JGLO $0.81
- BDVL $0.22
- JGLO $0.81
- BDVL Jun 15, 2026
- JGLO Dec 16, 2025
- BDVL Jun 18, 2026
- JGLO Dec 18, 2025
- BDVL Twice a year
- JGLO Annual
Distribution history
BDVL vs JGLO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDVL 8.7%JGLO 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BDVL 0.60JGLO 1.05
- Worst fall
- BDVL −7.7%JGLO −16.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BDVL 0.61JGLO 0.87
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.